Xinyang Dan Bu Rentong: Dangdai Zhongguo Xinyang De Shehuixue Quanshi (Believing without Identifying: The Sociological Interpretation of Spiritual Beliefs in Contemporary China)
Nanlai Cao
2011-01-01
China Perspectives
Abstract:Li Xiangping Xinyang dan bu rentong: Dangdai zhongguo xinyang de shehuixue quanshi (Believing without Identifying: Sociological Interpretation of Spiritual Beliefs in Contemporary China), Beijing, Social Sciences Academic Press, 2010.Li Xiangping has made important contributions to development of sociology of in China by pointing out socially and his- torically embedded nature of religious in a series of Chinese- language publications. His latest book, Believing without Identifying: Sociological Interpretation of Spiritual Beliefs in Contemporary China, urges people to focus on various religious, spiritual, cultural, and political beliefs as social phenomena and forms of social relationship and to gain a deeper understanding of broader historical context from which con- temporary Chinese practices of emerged. This thought-provoking book is a revised collection of his work spanning a three-year period. It in- cludes unpublished work as well as essays published previously in aca- demic journals and newspapers, and also draws on lectures and presenta- tions he has given at various conferences. Framed by arguments concern- ing issues of and social aspects of religious practice in contem- porary China, book is divided into four thematic sections: The histor- ical transformation of Chinese beliefs, and rise of Chinese modernity, of and distinctions in and the basic structure of a sociology of belief.The author draws on popular media materials, insightful anecdote obser- vations, face-to-face interviews, and historical and literary texts to explore how beliefs of Chinese are articulated, practiced, contested, and confirmed as they relate to complex interactions between power, cial status, and identity in contemporary China. His larger structural con- cerns throughout book mark a departure from traditional doctri- nal-textual approach to study of in China.Li draws a careful distinction between (zongjiao) and (xinyang), and points out that religion is not main organizing principle of Chinese civilization but various types of are, be they cultural, reli- gious, ethnic, political, or (p. 43). According to him, it is only through such institutional mediums as state, race or ethnicity, religion, rural grassroots organisation, social status, and identity that takes various socially definable and recognised forms (e.g., cultural belief, political belief, ethnic/racial belief, religious belief, and folk belief). He employs hair- skin metaphor to refer to closely intertwined relationship between (inner) and underlying social mechanisms. Furthermore, he ar- gues that diverse phenomena of reflect unequal power relations, be- cause without affirmation and protection of a corresponding social identity and status, one's cannot be mobilised as a resource for cial participation and construction of daily life. He suggests that inner should not be taken as a proper object of sociological analysis on its own but must be studied in relation to social-political milieu in which it is embedded. Therefore, as he contends, what sociologists should be con- cerned with is not Chinese lack of beliefs or a commonly discussed spiritual vacuum in post-Mao period, but how people come to be- lieve and practice their beliefs as well as social implications of such practices.The book has significant implications for practicing sociology of reli- gion in China.As a Chinese scholar who was trained initially as a historian before prac- ticing as a sociologist of religion, Li succeeds in his aim of placing prac- tices of in a wider disciplinary context. He defines what he calls so- ciology of belief as a research field focused on not just institutionalised but also privatised belief, syncretised religion, religion-state rela- tions, and inter-faith relationships. …