Abstract:Traditionally, translators and interpreters are viewed as neutral intermediaries who facilitate communication between people who do not share the same language. However, because cultural consciousness is embedded in language, translation and interpretation do not simply transfer information from one language to another but are political acts that can define, shape, and resist norms and values of both the source and target cultures. The production of translation and interpretation cannot be separated from the analysis of knowledge, reasoning, and cultural consciousness—along with the tensions inherent in the (re)production of power and cultural hierarchies. There are four themes when exploring the politics and political nature of translation and interpreting as communicative activity: (a) the historical roles of translations and interpreters, (b) translation as a change agent, (c) language access as justice, and (d) technology as a solution to language barriers. Translators traditionally claim an invisible, passive, conduit role to legitimize their work. It is assumed that the translator role is akin to a bureaucratic function. Translators may not alter the contents of business conversations and contracts, diplomatic exchanges, literature, or religious texts. Nevertheless, researchers have found that translation is not only a product of cross-cultural interactions but also a process that cannot avoid changing the language, ideology, and knowledge of both the source culture and the target culture. Language itself harbors biases and perspectives. Also, translators’ strategies of foreignizing or domesticating translation can be the result of purposeful decisions, aiming to shape the cultural consciousness of the target culture. Early studies of the impact of translation centered on the use of translation in enforcing and imposing the hierarchical superiority and worldviews of the dominant culture of the colonizers, including proselytizing activities. Recent studies, however, have also argued that translations can be a form of resistance and activism. For example, the translation movement in Ireland at the turn of the 20th century was an important factor in Ireland’s independence. Because translation and interpretation are essential in shaping realities and defining identities in international communication, language access is viewed as the prerequisite to ensure a fair trial and due process in international courts. The history of the “language battle” in the Paris Peace Conference and the subsequent development of simultaneous interpreting demonstrate that interpreters are not passive participants but active collaborators, working with other participants to meet the objectives of both ideological and communicative activities. Finally, technology allows individuals, and not just nations or large institutions, to afford and have access to professional translation and interpretation services for the first time in history. The rise of machine translation and machine learning has transformed the landscape and possibilities of translation and interpreting activities. Technology has the potential to influence not only translation and interpretation but also the larger human/cultural consciousnesses in international communication. The perspective or worldview embedded in a language can be enshrined in artificial intelligence and machine programming.

The Political of Translation:One Agende in the Studies of Marx's Text

The Differentia in Translation: One Agenda in the Studies of Marx's Text

The Dimensionality of Marx's Political Emancipation and Chinese Political Development

Translation and the political: antagonism and hegemony

The Constructiveness of Translation Criticism in Critical Cases

Translation,Different Texts and Transformed Language

Translation Studies in China:Its Functions and A Possible Direction for Its Further Development

The Cultural Construction of Translation and the Translation Turn in Cultural Studies

On the Translation of Academic Political Text from the Perspective of Chesterman’s Translation Norm: Case Study of Translating The Realization of the Historical Mission of Literature and Art in Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New

Research on Translator’s Subjectivity in Chinese Translation of Ideology

Translation, Globalisation and Localisation A Chinese Perspective Introduction

An Exploration of Communicative Translation Strategies for Chinese Political Metaphors

An Inspiration of Theoretical Awareness in Translation Assessment and Research——On the significance of the dispute over Chinese translations of Le Rouge et le Noir

Ideology, patronage, and manipulation of translation in Zouxiang weilai congshu: With special reference to the translation and introduction of Max Weber

Analysis of the Translation Problems of Words with Chinese Characteristics: Taking Chinese-English Translation as an Example

Translating Political Discourse: A Critical Review of Studies in Western and Chinese Contexts

The Politics of Translation and Interpretation in International Communication

A Contrastive Study of the Translator’s Behaviour in English and Spanish Translations of Metaphors in Xi Jinping: The Governance of China

A Study of Translation Methods Adopted in the Yangs’ Version of “Master Gao” from the Perspective of Manipulation Theory

An Reanalysis of two Translated Versions of Pride and Prejudice from the Perspective of Sociological Translation Studies

The Politics of Translation in International Relations