Abstract:Objectives We used three-dimensional (3D) virtual images to undertake a subjective evaluation of how different factors affect the perception of facial asymmetry among orthodontists and laypersons with the aim of providing a quantitative reference for clinics. Materials and methods A 3D virtual symmetrical facial image was acquired using FaceGen Modeller software. The left chin, mandible, lip and cheek of the virtual face were simulated in the horizontal (interior/exterior), vertical (up/down), or sagittal (forward or backward) direction in 3, 5, and 7 mm respectively with Maya software to increase asymmetry for the further subjective evaluation. A pilot study was performed among ten volunteers and 30 subjects of each group were expected to be included based on 80% sensitivity in this study. The sample size was increased by 60% to exclude incomplete and unqualified questionnaires. Eventually, a total of 48 orthodontists and 40 laypersons evaluated these images with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The images were presented in random order. Each image would stop for 30 s for observers with a two-second interval between images. Asymmetry ratings and recognition accuracy for asymmetric virtual faces were analyzed to explore how different factors affect the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. Multivariate linear regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used for statistical data analysis. Results Orthodontists were found to be more critical of asymmetry than laypersons. Our results showed that observers progressively decreased ratings by 1.219 on the VAS scale and increased recognition rates by 2.301-fold as the degree of asymmetry increased by 2 mm; asymmetry in the sagittal direction was the least noticeable compared with the horizontal and vertical directions; and chin asymmetry turned out to be the most sensitive part among the four parts we simulated. Mandible asymmetry was easily confused with cheek asymmetry in the horizontal direction. Conclusions The degree, types and parts of asymmetry can affect ratings for facial deformity as well as the accuracy rate of identifying the asymmetrical part. Although orthodontists have higher accuracy in diagnosing asymmetrical faces than laypersons, they fail to correctly distinguish some specific asymmetrical areas.

Quantitative Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry with 3-D Laser Scanning

Flip-Registration Procedure of Three-dimensional Laser Surface Scanning Images on Quantitative Evaluation of Facial Asymmetries

Digital Evaluation for Facial Asymmetry Patients after Surgical Treatment

Quantitative Analysis of Facial Symmetry by Using Three-Dimensional Technology

Quantitative Evaluation Of Three-Dimensional Facial Scanners Measurement Accuracy For Facial Deformity

Applying 3D scanning to evaluate facial symmetry in Asian populations

3D facial mask for facial asymmetry diagnosis

A Study on 3D Facial Measurement

Three-dimensional Facial Scanner in the Hands of Patients: Validation of a Novel Application on Ipad/iphone for Three-Dimensional Imaging

Quantitative evaluation of the measurement accuracy of 2 three-dimensional facial scanners

Initial application of laser scanning for three-dimensional reconstruction and anthropometrics of facial deformity

Comparison of Two Kinds of Methods Evaluating the Degree of Facial Asymmetry by Three-Dimensional Data

Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy.

Primary Study of Three-Dimensional and Automatic Facial Measuring System Based on Laser Scanning

The Comparison between 3D Laser Scanning and Direct Manual Measurement for Craniofacial Measurement

Study of facial measurement by a 3-D optical system

[Evaluation of Measurement Accuracy of Three Facial Scanners Based on Different Scanning Principles].

Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study

Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems

Digital Human: Three-dimentional face model reconstruction based on Hifi3dface model with clinical two-dimentional photos

An Optical Real-Time 3-D Measurement For Analysis Of Facial Shape And Movement