Abstract:We show that electron pairing is indispensable for the development of the leading edge gap as observed in ARPES measurement in the underdoped cuprates, even though clear evidence for the violation of the particle-hole symmetry is found in the electron spectrum. To support this assertion, we studied the electron spectrum under the scattering of diffusive antiferromagnetic(AF) spin fluctuation, which is thought to be a major candidate for a competing order in the competing order scenario of the pseudogap phenomena. We find that the Fermi level crossing along the M=(π,0) to X=(π,π) line can only be avoided when the M point is pushed above the Fermi level in this scenario. We argue that the same conclusion holds in all competing order scenarios that preserve the U(1) charge conservation. The inconsistency between this prediction and the ARPES observation implies that a competing order in the particle-hole channel alone is not sufficient to explain the pseudogap as observed in ARPES measurement. We also find that the electron system always forms a single large Fermi surface under the scattering of short-ranged dynamical spin fluctuation, rather than forming small Fermi pockets as predicted by the AF band folding picture. The AF shadow band is smeared out in energy as a result of the dispersion in the scattered quasiparticle state and the diffusion in spin fluctuation energy. Nevertheless, we find that the AF band folding effect is important for the understanding of the quasiparticle dynamics in the pseudogap phase, especially, of the origin of the high energy hump structure in the anti-nodal region and the signature of particle-hole asymmetry in the electron spectrum.

Two-Energy-Gap Preformed-Pair Scenario for Cuprate Superconductors: Implications for Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

A Two Energy Gap Preformed-Pair Scenario for the Cuprates

Preformed Pairs Induced Pseudogap Behavior In High-T-C Cuprates

Two Pseudogaps with Different Energy Scales at the Antinode of the High-Temperature Bi2sr2cuo6 Superconductor Using Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

The Two Component Optical Conductivity in the Cuprates: A Necessary Consequence of Preformed Pairs

Equivalence of pseudogap and pairing energy in a cuprate high-temperature superconductor

Pseudogap Phenomena in the Superconducting Phase of the Cuprates

A competing order scenario of two-gap behavior in hole doped cuprates

Relationship Between the Pseudo- and Superconducting Gaps: Effects of Residual Pairing Correlations Belowtc

Superconducting Gap in the Hubbard Model and the Two-Gap Energy Scales of High-TcCuprate Superconductors

Pairing Gaps, Pseudogaps, and Phase Diagrams for Cuprate Superconductors

Pairing origin of the pseudogap as observed in ARPES measurement in the underdoped cuprates

Two Gaps with One Energy Scale in Cuprate Superconductors

Pseudogap and Superconducting Fluctuations in High-Tc Cuprates

Two energy scales and close relationship between the pseudogap and superconductivity in underdoped cuprate superconductors

Energy gaps in high-transition-temperature cuprate superconductors

Phenomenological Description of the Spectral Function for the Pseudogap and Superconducting Phases of High-T$_c$ Cuprates

Signatures of Superconductivity and Pseudogap Formation in Non-Equilibrium Nodal Quasiparticles Revealed by Ultrafast Angle-Resolved Photoemission

Particle-Hole Asymmetry in the Cuprate Pseudogap Measured with Time-Resolved Spectroscopy

Phenomenological single-particle Green's function for the pseudogap and superconducting phases of high-<i>T<sub>c</sub></i> cuprates

Pairing, Pair-Breaking, and Their Roles in Setting the Tc of Cuprate High Temperature Superconductors