Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a three‐dimensional framework to facilitate future definitions of intellectual capital (IC). The concept of IC is often ill‐defined and there is a multitude of different definitions for the construct of IC. The lack of a common platform for dialogue has negative implications for research and practice in the field as it has hinders cross‐disciplinary learning. This paper aims to presents a flexible framework in order to make important differences explicit and therefore, if adopted, facilitates the creation of a cohesive body of knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The paper utilises a systematic review process. This methodology was initially developed in the medical science to produce a replicable, scientific, and transparent analysis of evidence in the literature and has recently been broad into management science. A total of 938 papers were analysed to extract findings. The summary of the review protocol can be found in the Appendix. Findings Analysing the literature allowed the necessary components of a definition together with a list of possible sub‐components to be extracted. Definitions of IC need to be explicit about the: component parts of the construct; role IC will take in an organisation; and disciplinary perspective taken for the discussion. Research limitations/implications This paper presents the necessary components of a definition of IC. If widely used, it would be able to facilitate cross‐disciplinary understanding and hopefully inter‐disciplinary research. It is seen as a starting point and open for future extension and development. A systematic review aims to limit bias and random error, however, it is limited by its scope on the basis of the defined research question and therefore delimited by factors outlined in the research protocol. Practical implications The major implication for practitioners is the understanding that IC can mean very different things for different people. Insights outlined in this paper will enable anyone to understand better the important construct of IC from different perspectives, which in turn should facilitate dialogue and avoid many unnecessary misunderstandings. Originality/value The paper is a first attempt to present a framework to facilitate future definitions of IC. If used, discussed, and extended in the future, it could present an important corner stone for better cross‐disciplinary dialogue and the establishment of a research field of IC.

Enterprise Intellectual Capital Development:A three-dimensional Theoretical Framework

Measuring Intellectual Capital:a New Model and Empirical Study

An Empirical Research on Configuration of Entrepreneurial Intellectual Capital in Small and Medium High-Tech Enterprises

A Study on Intellectual Capital-driven Dynamic capabilities and Realization Mechanism of Competitive advantage

The Analysis on the Mode of Western Enterprises ICRs and Its Revelation

An Empirical Study on Mechanism of Intellectual Capital Formation in Hi-Tech Entrepreneurial Enterprises

Intellectual Capital Integration And Its Dynamic Development Mechanism Research

Exploring the Role of Intellectual Capital in Supply Chain Intelligence Integration

Inner-Born Resources of New Enterprises' Growth:Intellectual Capital

Study on Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Organizational Performance of the Enterprises

Construction Model Of Corporate Social Capital And Implications For Enterprises In China - An Interactive Perspective

Intellectual Capital On The Role Of Corporate Performance

Defining intellectual capital: a three‐dimensional approach

Theoretical Analysis on the Forming and Characteristics of Enterprise Intrinsic Value of Intelligence Capital

A Conceptual Framework For Proprietary-Leveraged Innovation Capabilities

Research on the Structural Model of Enterprise Competitive Intelligence Competence

Measuring of Enterprise Intellectual Capital from Performance Perspective

Towards a Conceptual Template for Intellectual Capital Measurement and Reporting

Concept and Theoretical Explanations of Intellectual Capital

Investment in Intellectual Capital and Capitalization of Enterprises——Empirical Study of Software Listed Companies

The microcosmic evaluation model of enterprises' IC based on the DuPont system