Abstract:Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flows are performed with opposition control at Re= 180 and 1000. The drag reduction rate at the higher Reynolds number is reduced by 25% compared with that at the lower Reynolds number. In order to investigate the reason for the degradation of the control effectiveness, we examine the response of Reynolds stresses and coherent structures in both the outer and inner regions to the control and the role that large-scale motions play therein. In the outer region, the Reynolds stresses at different length scales are reduced at the same rate as the drag reduction rate, and conditionally averaged large-scale motions with spanwise scale larger than half channel width are still large-scale low-speed streaks flanked by a pair of large-scale counter-rotating streamwise vortices but with reduced velocity amplitudes. In the inner region, the effectiveness of the control in suppressing the turbulence deteriorates at the higher Reynolds number. In response to the superimposition effect of large-scale motions, the contribution to near-wall wall-parallel velocity fluctuations from large-scale motions becomes larger at the higher Reynolds number, while the suppression of large-scale motions by the control is weaker than that of near-wall coherent structures. In both controlled and uncontrolled cases, large-scale motions can modulate the amplitudes of near-wall coherent structures, and the attenuation of streamwise vortices by the control under large-scale high-speed streaks is significantly less effective than that under large-scale low-speed streaks. As a result, the effectiveness of control in suppressing near-wall coherent structures and Reynolds shear stresses becomes weaker at the higher Reynolds number. The quantitative analysis of the contributions to the drag reduction rate from outer and inner regions shows that the effectiveness of the control is mainly determined by the suppression degree of near-wall motions. Furthermore, budgets of streamwise enstrophy are analysed to reveal the interaction of large-scale motions with near-wall streamwise vorticity. The titling effect induced by large-scale motions is positive under large-scale high-speed streaks, but negative under large-scale low-speed streaks, which could be a possible way of large-scale motion to modulate streamwise vorticity. In the controlled cases, the positive titling effect induced by large-scale motions under large-scale high-speed streaks is even enhanced, while other terms in the budgets are reduced, which could explain the degradation of control effectiveness in suppressing near-wall streamwise vortices under large-scale high-speed streaks. Therefore, the loss in the drag reduction rate at the higher Reynolds number is due to the weakened control effectiveness on near-wall coherent structures, which are exposed to the modulation effect of large-scale motions.

Transient Response of Enstrophy Transport to Opposition Control in Turbulent Channel Flow

Transient response of Reynolds stress transport to spanwise wall oscillation in a turbulent channel flow

Active Control for Drag Reduction in Turbulent Channel Flow: the Opposition Control Schemes Revisited

Origin of Effectiveness Degradation in Active Drag Reduction Control of Turbulent Channel Flow at Reτ = 1000

Feedback control for transition suppression in direct numerical simulations of channel flow

Effect of active control on linear transient growth in turbulent channel flow

Influence of Active Control on Stg-Based Generation of Streamwise Vortices in Near-Wall Turbulence

Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boundary layers with opposition control

A comparison of opposition control in turbulent boundary layer and turbulent channel flow

Transient Growth in Turbulent Particle-Laden Channel Flow

Controllability of Flow Turbulence.

Non-equilibrium Turbulent Phenomena in Transitional Channel Flows

Turbulent Boundary Layer Control Via a Streamwise Travelling Wave Induced by an External Force

Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise traveling waves. Part 1: Receptivity analysis

Kinetic Energy and Enstrophy Transfer in Compressible Rayleigh–Taylor Turbulence

ACTIVE CONTROL OF TAYLOR-GÖTLER VORTICES IN TURBULENT CURVED CHANNEL FLOW

Convection-Enabled Boundary Control of a 2D Channel Flow

Turbulent channel flow controlled by traveling-wave-like body force mimicking oscillating thin films

Vorticity transport in a turbulent channel flow subjected to streamwise travelling waves

Global energy fluxes in fully-developed turbulent channels with flow control

Turbulent mixed convection in vertical and horizontal channels