Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

Research and Revelation of the “All-round Evaluation”of the Quality of Journals in Library Sciences

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Evaluation of the Quality of Library and Information Science Education and its Generality and Individuality

Study on Quality Evaluation in DFQ

Research on Evaluation of E-books in Libraries Based on All-around Evaluation System

The Reserch on the Evaluation System for Community Health Service Centers

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

A Review on Core Journal Research in China since the 1970s

Evaluation of Library Service Quality:Impact Factors and Control

The Evaluation of Open Access Journals based on All-around Evaluation System:Take the Outstanding Journals in Sciencepaper Online for Example

Research on the Quality-and-Innovation-oriented Academic Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences

Analysis Of Academic Evaluation Indicators Based On Citation Quality

Review on the Concept,Model,Development History and Methods of Library Evaluation

The Design and Development of Online Evaluation System for Digital Libraries

Evaluation on the development of philosophical social science

A Study on Evaluation Indicator System for Journals of Humanities and Social Science

Thoughts on the Research of the Multi-evaluation System of the Quality of “Ideological and Political Theories Teaching in All Courses” in Colleges and Universities

Evaluating journal quality : A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in library and information science core journals

Building a System of "student Three Evaluation" Based on the Perceptive Quality of Students

Academic research groups: evaluation of their quality and quality of their evaluation

Research on Quality Evaluation Index System for Joint Doctoral Programs by Universities and Institutes of Engineering