Effects of Lacrimal plugs and artificial tears on visual quality and tear film stability in xerophthalmia treatment

QIU Wei-Qiang,LI Xue-Min,WANG Wei,LIU Zi-Yuan,ZHANG Zhi-Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2013.10.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of lacrimal plugs and artificial tears on visual quality and tear film stability in patients with dry eye.Methods Twenty-eight patients with dry eyes treated at the center of ophthalmology of the 3rd hospital,Peking University between May and October in 2009 were randomly divided into artificial tears treatment group(16 cases) and lacrimal plugs treatment group (12 cases).The two groups were treated with artificial tears and lacrimal plugs,respectively.Questionnaires on dry eye symptoms were given to the patients and examinations of orneal fluorescein staining,break up time(BUT),Schirmer I test(SIT) and contrast sensitivity were carried out on the patients before treatment and after the treatment of 2 weeks.Results The results of the questionnaires showed that 28 patients all had discomfort symptoms related with dry eyes before treatment,and the symptoms improved after the treatment with artifitial tears or lacrimal plugs,and no difference on effects between both was found statistically significant (P=0.082).Corneal fluorescein staining test displayed that patients with corneal fluorescein staining symptom before treatment all turned into negative in fluorescein staining after the treatment with artifitial tears or lacrimal plugs.In lacrimal plugs group,BUT was (3.1±1.5)s before the treatment,and was (6.6±1.3) s after the treatment; In artifitial tears treatment group,BUT was (4.4±1.1)s before treatment and was (6.5±1.1) s after treatment;BUT in both groups were significantly improved after treatment(P<0.001) and lacrimal plugs treatment group was better than artifitial tears treatment group(P < 0.001).SIT was (12.1±7.7)mm before treatment and was (14.4±9.0)mm after treatment in artifitial tears treatment group,and no significant changes were found (P=0.072);In lacrimal plugs treatment group,SIT was (7.8±2.6)mm before treatment and was (14.0±3.4)mm after treatment,and significant change was found (P<0.001).The contrast sensitivity indicated that artifitial tears and lacrimal plugs could significantly improve the contrast sensitivity and visual quality in patients with dry eyes,but the differences on improvement had no statistical significance (all P>0.05).Conclusion Artifitial tears and lacrimal plugs may relieve discomfort symptoms repair damaged cornea,strengthen tear film stability,improve contrast sensitivity and visual quality in patients with dry eyes.Lacrimal plugs may be better in protecting tear film stability and extending BUT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?