Comparative study on survey methods of Oncomelania hupensis in marshland and lake regions

Zhang Zhi-jie,Peng Wen-xiang,Zhou Yi-biao,Zhuang Jian-lin,Chen Geng-xin,Wei Jian-guo,Cui Dao-yong,Ni Ying,Jiang Qing-wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-6661.2007.01.010
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore a better method for investigating Oncomelania hupensis in marshland and lake regions. Methods A bottomland was randomly selected as the research field from the 14 bottomlands along the Qiupu River in Guichi District, Chizhou City, Anhui Province, and the conventional survey, individually repeated survey, crossed-repeated survey and crosscheck-random sampling inspection survey were used in the same research area. The snail density and omission rate were used to evaluate the data quality of the different survey methods. Results There were no statistically significant differences on snail density among the following three survey methods, individually repeated survey, crossed-repeated survey and crosscheck-random sampling inspection survey, tested by the method of Kruskal-WallisH test(χ2=3.87,P=0.144),which were different from snail density of conventional survey(U=309.00, P<0.01). Omission rates of individually repeated survey, crossed-repeated survey and crosscheck-random sampling inspection survey were different tested by the method of Kruskal-Wallis H test (χ2=37.44, P<0.01) and crosscheck-random sampling inspection survey had the smallest omission rate Conclusions Crosscheck-random sampling inspection survey is the best method to investigate Oncomelania hupensis, and can be used for quantitative study in field, while the data from conventional survey should be cautiously used to study Oncomelania hupensis quantitatively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?