Clinical Characteristics of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Young and Elder Patients

魏本林
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2010.05.021
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical features and diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma in young adults and elder patients.Methods:A retrospective review of 84 patients who were diagnosed with RCC from 2005 to 2009 was performed.They were divided into two groups:young(≤40 years,36cases) and elder(40 years,48 cases).Their clinical features,laboratory examinations,imaging studies,clinical TNM staging were analyzed.Results:The incidentaloma rates were 52.78%(19/36,in young adults) and 62.50%(30/48,in elder).The rate of carcinoma with symptoms was higher in young(47.2%) than in elder patients (37.50%).The main clinical symptoms was low back pain and hematuria in both groups.Parts of those patients got both symptoms.But there was no significant deviation between the two groups.The main paraneoplastic syndrome in the young groups was the change of hemoglobin(38.89%,14/36),and in the elder group,hypertension was the main change(27.08%,13/48).94.44%(34/36)tumors were detected by sonography in the young adults group and 93.75%(45/48) in the elder patients group.Most of them performed CT scan,and the definite diagnosis rates were 96.97%(32/33) and 97.50%(39/40).The clinical TNM staging were as follows:in the young adults group,T1 66.67%(24/36),T2 8.33%(3/36),T3 11.11%(4/36),T4 13.89%(5/36),N1 5.56%(2/36),no N2,and M1 2.78%(1/36);in the elder group,T1 62.50%(30/48),T2 10.42%(5/48),T3 12.50%(6/48),T4 14.58%(7/48),N1 4.17%(2/48),N2 2.08%(1/48),and M1 2.08%(1/48).All cases were performed radical nephrectomy or nephron spare surgery and some of them accepted immunotherapy.Conclusions:The incidentaloma rates are significantly higher than those reported in documents,and implied an increasing tendency.There was no significant deviation in the rate of incidentaloma,clinical manifestations,TNM staging and the main treatments between the two groups.the main pathological type in both groups was clear cell carcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?