[The Impact of Itraconazole Versus Fluconazole on the Prevention of Postoperative Invasive Fungal Infections after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation].

Chang-jie Cai,Shu-hong Yi,Yi Guo,Min-ru Li,Hui-min Yi,Yang,Min-qiang Lu,Gui-hua Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.11.008
2007-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the efficiency and safety of itraconazole oral solution with those of fluconazole to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFI) in postoperative patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS In a randomized, controlled, open trial, 60 patients receiving OLT were randomized into itraconazole treatment group (n = 30) and fluconazole treatment group (n = 30). The patients in itraconazole treatment group were given itraconazole oral solution in a dose of 20 ml once a day for 15 days and the patients in the fluconazole treatment group were given fluconazole in a dose of 150 mg once a day also for 15 days. The incidences of fungal infections after liver transplantation and the resistance to drugs were recorded. RESULTS There were three patients in the itraconazole treatment group getting IFI; the infection rate was 10.0%. One patient had confirmed diagnosis and two other patients were diagnosed clinically. In the fluconazole treatment group there were 10 patients getting IFI, the infection rate was 33.3%. Two patients had confirmed diagnosis, six patients were diagnosed clinically and the remaining two were diagnosed tentatively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with fluconazole, itraconazole oral solution is more effective in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in postoperative patients receiving OLT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?