The effects of FLAG regimen for refractory or relapsing acute leukemia

李娟,黄蓓晖,罗绍凯,赵莹,彭爱华,周振海,张国材,童秀珍
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9921.2007.04.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of FLAG regimen for refractory or relapsing acute leukemia.Methods FLAG regimen(Fhdarabine 30 mg·m~(-2)·d~(-1),5 days,Ara-C 0.5~1.5 g/d,5 d ays,and G-CSF 250-300μg·d~(-1),5 days)were used to treat seventeen17 cases of refractory or relapsed acute leukemia.Results Four patients recerived CR in seven cases who were primary resistant to treatment;two patients received CR and one patient received PR in six cases who were early relapsed;and one patient re- ceived CR and one patient received PR who were lately relapsed.Seven cases received CR for ten cases of ANLL,while only one case received CR and one case received PR for seven cases of ALL.Total response rate of seven patients who received classic FLAG(six patients CR)was higher than those ten cases received low- FLAG(one patient CR and one patient PR).Median time to neutrophil recovery(500/μ1)was 21.5 days(16~34 days),while a platelet count20×10~9/L was reached after 22 days(14~32 days).The nonhematological toxicity mainly consisted of infection(15/17)and fever(5/17).There was no significant difference in the toxici- ty classic FLAG group and low-FLAG group.Conclusion FLAG shows obvious effects for refractory and re- lapsing acute non lymphocytic leukemia and the toxicity is mild.Low-FLAG gains poor effects and the toxity is the same as classic FLAG.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?