Meaning in Motion

Jeroen Groenendijk,Martin Stokhof
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4
2000-01-01
Abstract:The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of mean- ing. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric deflnite and indeflnite descrip- tions, which are treated as contextually dependent quantiflcational ex- pressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the difierence between mono- logue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information. 1 The development of formal semantics The flrst impetus towards a formal semantics in the modern sense of the word was given in the works of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. There is a clear link between in particular the works of Frege and modern intensional ('possible worlds') semantics, a link which was forged in the flfties and sixties by Carnap, Church, Hintikka, Kripke, and others. The flrst systematic ap- plications of intensional semantics in the analysis of natural language appear in the works of Kaplan, Lewis, and in particular Montague, at the beginning of the seventies. A new fleld of research emerged which still ∞ourishes today, albeit no longer in the form of 'orthodox' Montague grammar. Parallel to this development, but for a long time independent of it, quite difierent advances were made in the philosophy of language, which now are beginning to penetrate into formal semantics. Dynamic semantics can be ⁄ A Dutch version of this paper appeared in: Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor
What problem does this paper attempt to address?