Abstract:Abstract Automatic deception detection is a crucial task that has many applications both in direct physical and in computer-mediated human communication. Our focus is on automatic deception detection in text across cultures. In this context, we view culture through the prism of the individualism/collectivism dimension, and we approximate culture by using country as a proxy. Having as a starting point recent conclusions drawn from the social psychology discipline, we explore if differences in the usage of specific linguistic features of deception across cultures can be confirmed and attributed to cultural norms in respect to the individualism/collectivism divide. In addition, we investigate if a universal feature set for cross-cultural text deception detection tasks exists. We evaluate the predictive power of different feature sets and approaches. We create culture/language-aware classifiers by experimenting with a wide range of n-gram features from several levels of linguistic analysis, namely phonology, morphology and syntax, other linguistic cues like word and phoneme counts, pronouns use, etc., and token embeddings. We conducted our experiments over eleven data sets from five languages (English, Dutch, Russian, Spanish, and Romanian), from six countries (United States of America, Belgium, India, Russia, Mexico, and Romania), and we applied two classification methods, namely logistic regression and fine-tuned BERT models. The results showed that the undertaken task is fairly complex and demanding. Furthermore, there are indications that some linguistic cues of deception have cultural origins and are consistent in the context of diverse domains and data set settings for the same language. This is more evident for the usage of pronouns and the expression of sentiment in deceptive language. The results of this work show that the automatic deception detection across cultures and languages cannot be handled in unified manners and that such approaches should be augmented with knowledge about cultural differences and the domains of interest.

Culture and Deception in Business Negotiations: A Multilevel Analysis

Maybe It’s Right, Maybe It’s Wrong: Structural and Social Determinants of Deception in Negotiation

Sweet Little Lies: Social Context and the Use of Deception in Negotiation

Cultural Influence on Deceptive Communication

Deception detection in text and its relation to the cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism

The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.

Cultural Difference in Perception of Individual versus Organizational Bribery

Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: the Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities

When context trumps culture: Persuasion in international business disputes

Cultural Differences in Academic Dishonesty: A Social Learning Perspective

An empirical evaluation of interpersonal deception theory in a real-world, high-stakes environment

Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures: A Study of Negotiation Strategy and Outcomes in Three Cultures

How negotiators get to yes: predicting the constellation of strategies used across cultures to negotiate conflict

Nonverbal cues to deception: insights from a mock crime scenario in a Chinese sample

Misrepresentation of group contributions undermines conditional cooperation in a human decision making experiment

The Impact of Culture on Reactions to Promise Breaches: Differences Between East and West in Behavioral Integrity Perceptions

Personality Effects on the Endorsement of Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies: Business Ethics in Canada and China

Effect of Personality Traits and Social Value Orientation on The Tendency to Dishonesty”: An Empirical Study

Examining Cultural Intelligence and Cross-Cultural Negotiation Effectiveness

Negotiating with the Chinese: Are They More Likely to Use Unethical Strategies?

Preventing Cross-Cultural Bias in Deception Judgments