Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On the Principle of Statutory Jus In Rem

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

The Relationship between the Theory of Juristic Act of Real Right and the Distinguishing Principle in Property Law

On the Basic Principles in Civil Laws and Their Relations

On the Establishment of the Principle of Public Order and Good Morals

Party Autonomy and Conflict of laws in Real Property

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

On Claims in rem Based on Possession:Theoretical Reception in Substance and Procedure

Article 106 of Real Right Law:the Foundation of an Interpretative Theory

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

Claim of Right in Rem and the Application of Action Limitation

A Brief Comment on the Principle of Most Significant Relationship in Private International Law——Based on Article 145(2) of General Principles of the Civil Law and Article 126 of Contract Law of the PRC

On the Legislative Expressions of Basic Principles in Civil Law

The Logic of the Limitation of Public Interest on Basic Rights

How General Principles of Civil Law Reflects Civil Right?

Comments on Choice and Its Foundation of the Patterns of Remedy for Right in Rem

An Analysis on the Involution of China’s Litigation Object Theory