Abstract:Aim: The paper aims at defining the role of abductive reasoning in the reader’s interpretation of English fiction narrative text. Three research questions are defined as follows: (1) what is the nature of sign interpretation in its application to textual analysis? (2) what linguistic factors determine the use of abduction in the interpretation of signs? (3) how to apply abductive reasoning in the process of reading and interpretation in EFL teaching practice? Abduction is viewed here as a type of reasoning in the three-componential semiotic model of argument and as a deductive hypothesis, responsible for implicit meaning processing (Charles Peirce). Materials and Methods: The paper states the four-stage process of abduction to be a basic inquiry method of the reader on his way to fiction world interpretation. By providing a step-by-step analysis of patterns of abductive reasoning in a short story “Happy Endings” by Margaret Atwood, the paper conducts a textual analysis of narratives in terms of subjectivity theory of communication, reflecting the mechanisms of reader’s manipulation with information as a dynamic semiotic process of interpretation, limited by habit (final interpretant). Results: of the research of the mental operations employed by the reader while processing textual information proved a strong interrelation of reading with writing, and mental sub-processes and operations. As the empirical research shows, the process of conceptualization demands a higher level of cognitive maturity on the part of the reader/writer, as it presupposes “knowledge transforming” operations as opposed to “knowledge telling” strategy (Paltridge et. al. 2009: 20). To represent this process schematically, scholars assign the reader/interpretant the central role in the process of triadic sign interpretation, as he makes the further interpretation possible by a reference to the environment (Scheibmayer 2004: 305). The interpretant (I) and Representamen (R1) refer to the same object (O); as Representamen (R2) stands in the same relation to object, represented by Representamen (R1) and to the system (O2), where it acquires the functions of the observer (Sonnenhauser, 2008: 331). Conclusions: The conclusions coming from this research lead to the recognition of the second-level (or third level) observer as a source of subjectivity. And subjectivity, in its turn, arises from the difference in interpretation of signs recognized and established by the observer (Maturana & Varela, 1980). Thus, the process of differentiation by the observer is expected to fix the possible existence of other meanings, produced by the relations of the interpretant to the environment. This is the notion of thirdness. And, therefore, “sign situation”, plays the role of marking the pairs of differentiation in semiotic interpretation of signs. And it is this differential potential of indexical components of signs, and not their relatedness of meaning, which makes communication dynamic.

The Interpretation of Humor in Light of Abduction

Abduction and Metaphor: an Inquiry into Common Cognitive Mechanism

Abductive Inference and Scientific Metaphors

Linguistic Basis of Humor in Uses of Grice’s Cooperative Principle

How Humor is Experienced: an Embodied Metaphor Account

Psycholinguistic Model of Abductive Reasoning in Fiction Narrative Discourse

Abduction and Grammarization

THInC: A Theory-Driven Framework for Computational Humor Detection

APPROACHES TO HUMOR TRANSLATION IN AUDIOVISUAL TRANSLATION

We Are Humor Beings: Understanding and Predicting Visual Humor

An Analysis of Verbal Humor from the Perspective of the Cooperative Principle—A Case Study of Young Sheldon

An Analysis of Verbal Humor in 2 Broke Girls from the Perspective of Conversational Implicature

A Study of American Verbal Humor in The Big Bang Theory from the Perspective of Cooperative Principle

A Linguistic Analysis of Verbal Humor Found in the Transcription of Animated TV Series Gravity Falls

A Study on Instructional Humor: How Much Humor Is Used in Presentations?

Verbal humor in selected Indonesian stand up comedian’s discourse: Semantic analysis using GVTH

Translation and Humour

Verification of the Four-Stage Model of Humor Processing: Evidence from an fMRI Study by Three-Element Verbal Jokes

Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Verbal Humor: A Visual-World Eye-Tracking Study

This joke is [MASK]: Recognizing Humor and Offense with Prompting

DeHumor: Visual Analytics for Decomposing Humor