Improved Operative and Survival Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

C. L. Liu,S. T. Fan,C. M. Lo,W. K. Tso,C. M. Lam,J. Wong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5482
2006-01-01
Abstract:Background: The aim of the present study was to assess whether an aggressive surgical approach in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma was associated with improved operative and survival outcomes.Methods: Eighty-two patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma treated between 1989 and 1998 (period 1), and 60 patients treated between 1999 and 2004 (period 2), were evaluated. Modifications to management in period 2 primarily included percutaneous biliary drainage instead of endoscopic drainage for relief of obstructive jaundice, preoperative right portal vein embolization before right-sided hepatectomy, routine total caudate lobectomy and radical lymphadenectomy during surgical resection of the turnout.Results: The surgical resection rate was significantly higher in period 2 than in period 1 (45 Versus 16 per cent; P < 0.001). All patients in period 2 underwent major hepatectomy with concomitant caudate lobectomy. The operative morbidity and hospital mortality rates decreased significantly in period 2 compared with period 1, with significantly better survival outcomes. In multivariate analysis, resection of the turnout in period 2 and operative blood loss of 1.5 litres or less were the significant independent factors associated with improved survival.Conclusion: An aggressive surgical approach was associated with improved operative and survival outcomes for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?