Development of the Chronic Pain Cognition Scale: A Culture-Sensitive Pain Measurement in Chinese
Chih-Hsun Wu,Wei-Han Chou,Yi-Hsun Long,Hao-Han Yang,Tung Lin,Chi-Cheng Yang,Wei-Zen Sun,Chih-Cheng Chen,Chih-Peng Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S422197
IF: 2.8319
2023-09-07
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Chih-Hsun Wu, 1, 2 Wei-Han Chou, 3 Yi-Hsun Long, 2 Hao-Han Yang, 1 Tung Lin, 1 Chi-Cheng Yang, 1, 4 Wei-Zen Sun, 3 Chih-Cheng Chen, 5 Chih-Peng Lin 3 1 Department of Psychology, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2 Clinical Psychology Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 3 Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 4 Holistic Mental Health Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 5 Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Correspondence: Chih-Peng Lin, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung Shan S. Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Tel +886 2 23123456 &num262158, Fax +886 2 23415736, Email Purpose: People with pain problems are highly vulnerable to cultural disparities, and it is imperative to reduce these inequalities. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a culturally sensitive Chronic Pain Cognition Scale (CPCS) for Chinese-/Chinese dialect-speaking populations and investigate its psychometric properties. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with chronic low back pain or chronic neck pain who visited pain clinics at a medical center in northern Taiwan were enrolled. Participants completed the demographic, intensity of pain, and two other related sensations, "Sng (痠)" and "Ma (麻)", often reported in Chinese-speaking populations, CPCS, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Results: 200 patients were included. Patients' mean age was 64.84 ± 14.33, 126 (63.0%) were female, and 83 (41.5%) had 13+ years of education. The average duration of pain was 77.25 ± 97.46 months, the intensity of pain was 6.04 ± 2.50, Ma was 3.43 ± 3.24, and Sng was 4.54 ± 3.14. The CPCS comprised four factors: pain impact (how pain impact one's life), losing face (how one being disrespected due to pain), helplessness, and avoidance, with good structural validity and adequate reliability (Cronbach α, 0.60– 0.81) and satisfactory criterion-related validity. Moreover, losing face, an essential concept in Chinese relationalism, was significantly related to pain, Sng, and Ma (r = 0.19, 0.15 and 0.16), but not to pain acceptance or self-efficacy, indicating a culturally specific element in pain measurement. Conclusion: The CPCS has good psychometric properties and is suitable for evaluating chronic pain in the clinical setting, and might be generalizable to other Chinese-/Chinese dialect-speaking populations. Keywords: low back pain, neck pain, pain impact, losing face, helplessness, avoidance Reducing inequality is a significant issue in people with pain problems. Because pain is not merely nociception of physical damage but "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling, actual or potential tissue damage". 1 In 2020, the IASP added six notes to emphasize further that "pain is always a personal experience that is influenced to varying degrees by biological, psychological, and social factors" and "people learn the concept of pain through their life experiences". 2 These statements accentuated that "pain is learned", thus, it is impossible to ignore the influence of ethnicity/race and the culture in which one is raised. A recent topical review appealed to the importance of understanding how socioeconomic positions affect pain by psychosocial, behavioral, and biological mechanisms. 3 The study indicated that poorer socioeconomic positions, such as low education, low occupational positions, financial hardship, and living in a deprived area, are related to higher pain incidence, prevalence, intensity, frequency, and pain-related disability. In addition, some reviews on ethnicity/race noted that ethnic minority backgrounds are related to lower pain tolerance 4 and more pain-related suffering. 5 Culture can also affect how one experiences pain. Review studies have found cultural variations in illness perception, self-efficacy, coping strategies, locus of control, pain attitudes, 6 avoidance behavior, and pain intensity 7 in chronic pain. A study reviewed studies from 2000 to 2020 found that being minorities (mainly Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians), compared to the White population, negatively influenced the clinical decision-making of chronic pain. 8 The pain of minorities, especially Blacks, was often underestimated by physicians, less likely to receive opioids, and were monitored closer for possible opioids misuse. 8 Thus, it is imperative to combat these disparities in pain management. Therefore, h -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology