Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Adherence to Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients in Uruguay: First Nationwide Study
Valentina Mérola,Ana Carina Pizzarossa,Maynés López,Franco Peverelli,Gustavo Bruno,Mariana González,Federico Roca,Leticia Dentone,Gerardo Pérez,Lucía Da Silveira,Lilián Díaz,Josefina Tafuri,Rosario Cuadro,Martín Zaquiere,Guillermina Bartaburu,Franco Pacello,Carina Celio,María José López,Marcelo Viana,Laura Fraga,Valeria Blanco,Paula Chalart,Daniel Leal,Xilef Rodríguez,Laura Teti,Carolina Goñi,Eduardo Infante,Alejandra Prícoli,Victoria Altieri,Cecilia Guillermo,Rosario Martínez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241256368
2024-05-28
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Abstract:Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, Volume 30, Issue , January-December 2024. IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious, frequent, and preventable medical complication in hospitalized patients. Although the efficacy of prophylaxis (pharmacological and/or mechanical) has been demonstrated, compliance with prophylaxis is poor at international and national levels.AimTo determine the indication and use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients in Uruguay.MethodsAn observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study involving 31 nationwide healthcare facilities was conducted. Baseline characteristics associated with hospital admission, the percentage of the population with an indication for thromboprophylaxis, and the percentage of patients receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis were assessed. The VTE risk was determined using the Padua score for medical patients; the Caprini score for surgical patients; the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines for pregnant-postpartum patients.Results1925 patients were included, representing 26% of hospitalized patients in Uruguay. 71.9% of all patients were at risk of VTE. Of all patients at risk of VTE, 58.6% received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The reasons for not receiving thromboprophylaxis were prescribing omissions in 16.1% of cases, contraindication in 15.9% and 9.4% of patients were already anticoagulated for other reasons. Overall, just 68% of patients were "protected" against VTE. Recommendations of major thromboprophylaxis guidelines were followed in 70.1% of patients at risk.ConclusionsDespite the progress made in adherence to thromboprophylaxis indications, nonadherence remains a problem, affecting one in six patients at risk of VTE in Uruguay
peripheral vascular disease,hematology