Abstract:We study a bilevel optimization problem which is a zero-sum Stackelberg game. In this problem, there are two players, a leader and a follower, who pick items from a common set. Both the leader and the follower have their own (multi-dimensional) budgets, respectively. Each item is associated with a profit, which is the same to the leader and the follower, and will consume the leader's (follower's) budget if it is selected by the leader (follower). The leader and the follower will select items in a sequential way: First, the leader selects items within the leader's budget. Then the follower selects items from the remaining items within the follower's budget. The goal of the leader is to minimize the maximum profit that the follower can obtain. Let s_A and s_B be the dimension of the leader's and follower's budget, respectively. A special case of our problem is the bilevel knapsack problem studied by Caprara et al. [SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2014], where s_A=s_B=1. We consider the general problem and obtain an (s_B+ϵ)-approximation algorithm when s_A and s_B are both constant. In particular, if s_B=1, our algorithm implies a PTAS for the bilevel knapsack problem, which is the first O(1)-approximation algorithm. We also complement our result by showing that there does not exist any (4/3-ϵ)-approximation algorithm even if s_A=1 and s_B=2. We also consider a variant of our problem with resource augmentation when s_A and s_B are both part of the input. We obtain an O(1)-approximation algorithm with O(1)-resource augmentation, that is, we give an algorithm that returns a solution which exceeds the given leader's budget by O(1) times, and the objective value achieved by the solution is O(1) times the optimal objective value that respects the leader's budget.

A note on a selfish bin packing problem

Bin Packing of Selfish Items

A Best Cost-Sharing Rule for Selfish Bin Packing

Best Cost-Sharing Rule Design for Selfish Bin Packing

Cost-Sharing Mechanisms For Selfish Bin Packing

From Packing Rules to Cost-Sharing Mechanisms.

An Asymptotic Competitive Scheme for Online Bin Packing.

Bin Packing with "largest in Bottom" Constraint: Tighter Bounds and Generalizations

On-Line Extensible Bin Packing with Unequal Bin Sizes

A General Bin Packing Game: Interest Taken into Account

Dynamic Bin Packing with Unit Fraction Items Revisited

Online Bin Packing of Fragile Objects with Application in Cellular Networks

Approximation Algorithms for Interdiction Problem with Packing Constraints

Linear Time-Approximation Algorithms for Bin Packing

A 17/10-Approximation Algorithm for K -Bounded Space On-Line Variable-Sized Bin Packing

On-Line Bin Packing with Arbitrary Release Times

A New Upper Bound 2.5545 on 2D Online Bin Packing.

Online Algorithms for 1-Space Bounded 2-Dimensional Bin Packing and Square Packing

Bin Packing Game With An Interest Matrix

Approximation Algorithms for a Bi-Level Knapsack Problem

A New Upper Bound on 2D Online Bin Packing