Abstract:Multi-sensor data fusion has received substantial attention thanks to its ability to integrate information from distinct sources efficiently. Nevertheless, the information collected from multi-sensors may be uncertain and imprecise, even conflicting in real applications. As a distinguished theory to handle uncertain and imprecise information, belief functions theory (BFT) is prevalent in the various fields of multi-sensor data fusion. Unfortunately, counter-intuitive behaviors may generate once facing highly conflicting pieces of evidence. To deal with the above-mentioned issue, in this paper, we study a novel belief Sørensen coefficient (BSC\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathcal {BSC}$$\end{document}) to measure the conflict between the pieces of evidence based on BFT. On the top of BSC\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathcal {BSC}$$\end{document}, we propose a new belief conflict coefficient, and prove some important properties, namely, non-negativity, symmetry, non-degeneracy, bounded, extreme consistency and insensitivity to refinement. In parallel, some numerical examples are employed to demonstrate the superiority of the belief conflict coefficient in quantifying the degree of conflict between the pieces of evidence. Finally, we design a new multi-sensor data fusion method based on the proposed BSC\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\mathcal {BSC}$$\end{document} and the improved belief entropy, and verify the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method with respect to other methods through several application cases.

A Set of Three New Conflict Measurement Methods for Different Evidence Condition

New Methods of Evidence Conflict Measurement Based on Conjunctive Combination Rule

New Measurement Methods of Evidence Conflict Based on Binary Function

Sensor Data Fusion Based on a New Conflict Measure

The Conflict-Handling Modes:A Review of Multi-Dimensional Models and Assessment of Classic Measuring Instruments

New Evidence Combination Method Based on Redistribution of Global Conflict

A New Method to Measure Evidence Conflict Based on Singular Value

New Method for Measuring the Degree of Conflict among General Basic Probability Assignments

A New Fast Combination Method of Conflict Evidences Based on Model Modification

A conflict evidence fusion method based on the composite discount factor and the game theory

A Conflict Evidence Fusion Method Based on Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity and the Belief Entropy

A novel divergence measure of mass function for conflict management

A New and Efficient Evidence Combination Method Based on Conjunctive Set and Disjunctive Set Weighting and Its Application

A new reason analysis of conflict evidence

A Novel Conflict Measurement in Decision-Making and Its Application in Fault Diagnosis

Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions

A novel multi-criteria conflict evidence combination method and its application to pattern recognition

Decompositional approach for evaluation of internal conflict in the framework of the evidence theory

An effective conflict management method based on belief similarity measure and entropy for multi-sensor data fusion

Efficient Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence

An improved evidence fusion algorithm in multi-sensor systems