Abstract:As a research branch of data mining, clustering, as an unsupervised learning scheme, focuses on assigning objects in the dataset into several groups, called clusters, without any prior knowledge. Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) is one of the most widely used clustering algorithms for spatial datasets, which can detect any shapes of clusters and can automatically identify noise points. However, there are several troublesome limitations of DBSCAN: (1) the performance of the algorithm depends on two specified parameters, ε and MinPts in which ε represents the maximum radius of a neighborhood from the observing point and MinPts means the minimum number of data points contained in such a neighborhood. (2) The time consumption for searching the nearest neighbors of each object is intolerable in the cluster expansion. (3) Selecting different starting points results in quite different consequences. (4) DBSCAN is unable to identify adjacent clusters of various densities. In addition to these restrictions about DBSCAN mentioned above, the identification of border points is often ignored. In our paper, we successfully solve the above problems. Firstly, we improve the traditional locality sensitive hashing method to implement fast query of nearest neighbors. Secondly, several definitions are redefined on the basis of the influence space of each object, which takes the nearest neighbors and the reverse nearest neighbors into account. The influence space is proved to be sensitive to local density changes to successfully reduce the amount of parameters and identify adjacent clusters of different densities. Moreover, this new relationship based on the influence space makes the insensitivity to the ordering of inputting points possible. Finally, a new concept—core density reachable based on the influence space is put forward which aims to distinguish between border objects and noisy objects. Several experiments are performed which demonstrate that the performance of our proposed algorithm is better than the traditional DBSCAN algorithm and the improved algorithm IS-DBSCAN.

A comparative study of two density-based spatial clustering algorithms for very large datasets

Comparative Density Peaks Clustering

A Statistical Information-Based Clustering Approach in Distance Space

A Fast Algorithm for Density-Based Clustering in Large Database

DBRS: a Density-Based Spatial Clustering Method with Random Sampling

DBSTC: an Effective Method for Discovering Cluster Features with Different Spatiotemporal Densities

An efficient and scalable density-based clustering algorithm for datasets with complex structures.

Using Greedy Algorithm: DBSCAN Revisited II

A Parallel Varied Density-Based Clustering Algorithm with Optimized Data Partition

Approaches for Scaling Dbscan Algorithm to Large Spatial Databases

A review of related density peaks clustering approaches

GriT-DBSCAN: A spatial clustering algorithm for very large databases

DBSCAN-MS: Distributed Density-Based Clustering in Metric Spaces

MDBSCAN: A multi-density DBSCAN based on relative density

Scaling Up the DBSCAN Algorithm for Clustering Large Spatial Databases Based on Sampling Technique

VDBSCAN: Varied Density Based Clustering Algorithm

An Improved Density-Based Cluster Analysis Method Combining Genetic Algorithm and Data Sampling for Large-Scale Datasets

Combining Sampling Technique With Dbscan Algorithm For Clustering Large Spatial Databases

Density-ratio Based Clustering for Discovering Clusters with Varying Densities.

Enabling DBSCAN for Very Large-Scale High-Dimensional Spaces

A Density-Based Spatial Clustering for Physical Constraints