CLUE: Achieving Fast Update over Compressed Table for Parallel Lookup with Reduced Dynamic Redundancy
Tong Yang,Ruian Duan,Jianyuan Lu,Shenjiang Zhang,Huichen Dai,Bin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2012.79
2012-01-01
Abstract:The sizes of routing table in backbone routers continue to keep a rapid growth and some of them currently increase up to 400K entries [1]. An effective solution to deflate the large table is the routing table compression. Meanwhile, there is an increasingly urgent demand for fast routing update mainly due to the change of network topology and new emerging Internet functionalities. Furthermore, the Internet link transmission speed has scaled up to 100Gbps commercially and towards 400Gbps Ethernet for laboratory experiments, resulting in a raring need of ultra-fast routing lookup. To achieve high performance, backbone routers must gracefully handle the three issues simultaneously: routing table Compression, fast routing Lookup, and fast incremental Update (CLUE), while previous works often only concentrate on one of the three dimensions. To address these issues, we propose a complete set of solutions-CLUE, by improving previous works and adding a novel incremental update mechanism. CLUE consists of three parts: a routing table compression algorithm, an improved parallel lookup mechanism, and a new fast incremental update mechanism. The routing table compression algorithm is based on ONRTC algorithm [2], a base for fast TCAM parallel lookup and fast update of TCAM. The second part is the improvement of the logical caching scheme for dynamic load balancing parallel lookup mechanism [3]. The third one is the conjunction of the trie, TCAM and redundant prefixes update algorithm. We analyze the performance of CLUE by mathematical proof, and draw the conclusion that speedup factor is proportional to the hit rate of redundant prefixes in the worst case, which is also confirmed by experimental results. Large-scale experimental results show that, compared with the mechanism in [3], CLUE only needs about 71% TCAM entries, 4.29% update time, and 3/4 dynamic redundant prefixes for the same throughput when using four TCAMs. In addition, CLUE has another advantage over the mechanism in [3] -- the frequent interactions between control plane and data plane caused by redundant prefixes update can be avoided.