A Better Blind Estimation Algorithm for Digital MIMO Channels
Tao Song,Jiadong Xu,Shuanggang Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2007.04.021
2007-01-01
Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
Abstract:Aim. The existing blind estimation algorithm is called HSB-IF (high statistics based inverse filter). We now present our estimation algorithm, which, we believe, is better than HSB-IF algorithm. In the full paper, we explain in some detail our better algorithm and its simulation results. In this abstract, we just add some pertinent remarks to listing the three topics of explanation. The first topic is: the mathematical model for the blind estimation problem of digital MIMO (multiple-input multiple-output) channels. The second topic is: the improved HSB-IF algorithm. Its two subtopics are.-HSB-IF algorithm (subtopic 2.1) and improved HSB-IF algorithm (subtopic 2.2). In topic 2, we do essentially two things; (1) we use particle swarm algorithm to estimate the outputs of channel equalizer and provide HSB-IF algorithm with this estimation; (2) our improved HSB-IF algorithm uses the signal space diversity information and the signal time diversity information; so, its performance is better than that of HSB-IF algorithm, which only uses the signal space diversity information. The third topic is: simulation results and their analysis. In the full paper, there are three figures summarizing the simulation results. These results show preliminarily that: (1) when the SNR of MIMO system is small, for example, SNR<10 dB, the improved algorithm can get 2-10 dB improvement compared with the HSB-IF algorithm, and the improvement increases with decreasing SNR input; (2) the improved algorithm is not so sensitive to the estimation of channel orders as the HSB-IF algorithm; (3) when the output samples are less than 500, the HSB-IF algorithm can not get good performance while the improved algorithm achieves good results; it gets 3 dB improvement compared with the HSB-IF algorithm for 500 samples and 10 dB improvement for 200 samples; even when the output samples are more than 500, the improved algorithm still achieves better performance, although not so remarkable as for smaller number of output samples.