Abstract:The robustness and resilience of complex networks have been widely studied and discussed in both research and industry because today, the diversity of system components and the complexity of the connection between units are increasingly influencing the reliability of complex systems. Previous studies have focused on node failure in networks, proposing several performance indicators. However, a single performance indicator cannot comprehensively measure all the performance aspects; thus, the selected performance indicators and recovery strategies lack consistency with respect to the targeted complex systems. This paper introduces a novel stress-strength-balanced weighted network model based on two network transmission hypotheses. Then, with respect to different concerns of the complex network, we propose two modified network performance measurement indicators and compare these indicators in terms of their trends in the attack process. In addition, we introduce several network recovery strategies and compare their efficiencies. Our findings are as follows: (1) The evaluation and judgment of the network performance depend on the performance measurement indicators we use. (2) Different recovery strategies exhibit distinct efficiencies in recovering different aspects of network performance, and no strategy exists that can improve all the network performance aspects simultaneously. (3) The timing of the recovery is proved to have a deep influence on the cost and efficiency of network recovery; thus, the optimal recovery strategy for a damaged network varies with the extent of the damage. From the results of the simulation of the attack-recovery process, we conclude that while defining and analyzing complex network models, we should adjust our network topology, weight assignment, and performance indicators in accordance with the focal characteristics of complex systems so that we can use the network model to build robust complex systems and efficient logistics and maintenance strategies.

Index Correlation Adjustment Based on Orthogonalization for Network Damage Assessment

Dynamic Damage Evaluation of Network Availability Adjusted by Index Correlation

Space-Time Correlation Based Fault Correction of Wireless Sensor Networks

CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF ATTACK STRATEGIESAND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS ON THREE NETWORK MODELS

Degree of Network Damage: A Measurement for Intensity of Network Damage

Correlation of Centralities: A Study Through Distinct Graph Robustness

The restoration strategy for multiple faults in active distribution networks considering road‐network coupling

Topology Awareness on Network Damage Assessment and Control Strategies Generation

Research on the Invulnerability of Regional Network Based on Topology Analysis

Modeling Geographically Correlated Failures to Assess Network Vulnerability

Estimation of non-stationary network internal loss based on temporal and spatial correlation

Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks

Local Damage and Subspace Reconstruction in Topological Spaces of Coupled Systems

Study on Indices of Network Structure Robustness and Their Application

Index System and Method for Structure Strength Assessment of Urban Power Network

Urban Road Network Vulnerability Evaluation based on OD Matrix Estimation

Resilience assessment and recovery of distribution network considering the influence of communication network

Structure‐to‐structure seismic damage correlation model

The Hybrid Multivariate Analysis Method for Damage Detection

An adaptive decision method using structure feature analysis on dynamic fault propagation model

Characterization Method of Damage Information Based on Heterogeneous Network