Abstract:Defect reduction planning plays a vital role in enhancing software quality and minimizing software maintenance costs. By training a black box machine learning model and "explaining" its predictions, explainable AI for software engineering aims to identify the code characteristics that impact maintenance risks. However, post-hoc explanations do not always faithfully reflect what the original model computes. In this paper, we introduce CounterACT, a Counterfactual ACTion rule mining approach that can generate defect reduction plans without black-box models. By leveraging action rules, CounterACT provides a course of action that can be considered as a counterfactual explanation for the class (e.g., buggy or not buggy) assigned to a piece of code. We compare the effectiveness of CounterACT with the original action rule mining algorithm and six established defect reduction approaches on 9 software projects. Our evaluation is based on (a) overlap scores between proposed code changes and actual developer modifications; (b) improvement scores in future releases; and (c) the precision, recall, and F1-score of the plans. Our results show that, compared to competing approaches, CounterACT's explainable plans achieve higher overlap scores at the release level (median 95%) and commit level (median 85.97%), and they offer better trade-off between precision and recall (median F1-score 88.12%). Finally, we venture beyond planning and explore leveraging Large Language models (LLM) for generating code edits from our generated plans. Our results show that suggested LLM code edits supported by our plans are actionable and are more likely to pass relevant test cases than vanilla LLM code recommendations.

Mining Exception-Handling Rules As Sequence Association Rules

Mining Item-Item and Between-Set Correlated Association Rules

Making exceptions on exception handling

Mining Temporal Rules for Software Maintenance

Mining Past-Time Temporal Rules

Association Rules Mining Based on the Discriminative Concept Lattice

Effective Mining Algorithm of Association Rules Based on Benefit Measure

Dtgc-Tree: A New Strategy Of Association Rules Mining

Efficient Mining Of Recurrent Rules From A Sequence Database

Mining Past-Time Temporal Rules from Execution Traces.

Alattin: Mining Alternative Patterns for Defect Detection

NEGWeb : Detecting Neglected Conditions via Mining Programming Rules from Open Source Code

Mining Bug Classifier and Debug Strategy Association Rules for Web-Based Applications

Mining Association Rules to Support Resource Allocation in Business Process Management

Extended Association Rule Mining and Its Application to Software Engineering Data Sets

Mining Action Rules for Defect Reduction Planning

Mining of Multi-Relational Association Rules

Mining API Error-Handling Specifications from Source Code

Detecting Error-Handling Bugs without Error Specification Input.

Mining Rules from Real-Valued Time Series: A Relative Information-Gain-Based Approach

Visual Analysis of User-Driven Association Rule Mining