Abstract:Since the inception of the FIRST Robotics Competition (FRC) and its special playoff system, robotics teams have longed to appropriately quantify the strengths of their designed robots. The FRC includes a playground draft-like phase (alliance selection), arguably the most game-changing part of the competition, in which the top-8 robotics teams in a tournament based on the FRC's ranking system assess potential alliance members for the opportunity of partnering in a playoff stage. In such a three-versus-three competition, several measures and models have been used to characterize actual or relative robot strengths. However, existing models are found to have poor predictive performance due to their imprecise estimates of robot strengths caused by a small ratio of the number of observations to the number of robots. A more general regression model with latent clusters of robot strengths is, thus, proposed to enhance their predictive capacities. Two effective estimation procedures are further developed to simultaneously estimate the number of clusters, clusters of robots, and robot strengths. Meanwhile, some measures are used to assess the predictive ability of competing models, the agreement between published FRC measures of strength and model-based robot strengths of all, playoff, and FRC top-8 robots, and the agreement between FRC top-8 robots and model-based top robots. Moreover, the stability of estimated robot strengths and accuracies is investigated to determine whether the scheduled matches are excessive or insufficient. In the analysis of qualification data from the 2018 FRC Houston and Detroit championships, the predictive ability of our model is also shown to be significantly better than those of existing models. Teams who adopt the new model can now appropriately rank their preferences for playoff alliance partners with greater predictive capability than before.

A method for member selection of R&D teams using the individual and collaborative information

A Method of Partner Selection for Knowledge Collaboration Teams using Weighted Social Network Analysis

Ant colony algorithm for the partner selection problem in a complex product system project

A nonlinear program model to obtain consensus priority vector in the analytic hierarchy process

A Cooperative Effect-Based Decision Support Model for Team Formation.

A partner selection model for collaborative product innovation from the viewpoint of knowledge collaboration

A Reinforcement Learning-assisted Genetic Programming Algorithm for Team Formation Problem Considering Person-Job Matching

A Lexicographic Approach for Selecting R&D Projects with Resource Constraints

A Novel Decision-Making Method for Selecting Superintendent Based on a q-Rung Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Power Partitioned Bonferroni Mean Operator

Examining the Effect of a Genetic Algorithm-Enabled Grouping Method on Collaborative Performances, Processes, and Perceptions

Estimating Robot Strengths with Application to Selection of Alliance Members in FIRST Robotics Competitions

A Bidding Mechanism for Resource Constrained R&D Project Selection

Collaborative Learning Team Formation: AźCognitive Modeling Perspective

A Novel Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Team Building in Cloud Service Environment

An Integrated Framework for Team Formation and Winner Prediction in the FIRST Robotics Competition: Model, Algorithm, and Analysis

A multi-skilled staff scheduling and team configuration optimisation model for artificial intelligence project portfolio considering competence development and innovation-driven

A Relative Projection-Based Multiattribute Group Decision-Making Model With Noncooperative Behavior Management and Application to NEV Supplier Selection

Research on Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Method Based on Cooperative Performance.

Bidding Strategy to Support Decision-Making Based on Comprehensive Information in Construction Projects

A product co-design team performance evaluation method with considering both satisfaction and collaboration

A q-rung orthopair fuzzy non-cooperative game method for competitive strategy group decision-making problems based on a hybrid dynamic experts’ weight determining model