Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Effective Shape Measures in Malignant Risk Assessment for Breast Tumor on Sonography

Measuring shape complexity of breast lesions on ultrasound images

Shape symmetry analysis of breast tumors on ultrasound images

Complex cystic and solid breast lesions: diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound, strain imaging and point shear wave speed measurement.

Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification: Value in Malignancy Prediction for Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Lesions

3D Contouring for Breast Tumor in Sonography

Breast Tumor Classification Based on Shape Features of Ultrasonic Images

Breast Tumor Image Recognition of B-mode Ultrasonography Based on Shape and Gray Feature Analysis

Breast mass classification in ultrasound based on Kendall's shape manifold

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

A Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification Method via Efficiently Combining Texture and Morphological Features on Ultrasound Images

Quantification of Elastic Heterogeneity Using Contourlet-Based Texture Analysis in Shear-Wave Elastography for Breast Tumor Classification

Combination of conventional ultrasound with quantitative and qualitative analyses of CEUS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast solid lesions: A modified breast cancer model

Automatic Feature Extraction and Analysis on Breast Ultrasound Images

Bayesian Landmark-based Shape Analysis of Tumor Pathology Images

Tumour Ellipsification in Ultrasound Images for Treatment Prediction in Breast Cancer

Breast tumors recognition based on edge feature extraction using support vector machine

Correlation Between Conventional Ultrasound Features Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Patterns and Pathological Prognostic Factors in Malignant Non-Mass Breast Lesions.

Consistency of Describing Breast Mass by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Lexicon and Its Clinical Significance

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography