Abstract:Face recognition has received significant attention in the past decades due to its potential applications in biometrics, information security, law enforcement, etc. Numerous methods have been suggested to address this problem [1]. Among appearance-based holistic approaches, principal component analysis (PCA) turns out to be very effective. As a classical unsupervised learning and data analysis technique, PCA was first used to represent images of human faces by Sirovich and Kirby in 1987 [2, 3]. Subsequently, Turk and Pentland [4, 5] applied PCA to face recognition and presented the well-known Eigenfaces method in 1991. Since then, PCA has been widely investigated and has become one of the most successful approaches to face recognition [6-15]. PCA-based image representation and analysis technique is based on image vectors. That is, before applying PCA, the given 2D image matrices must be mapped into 1D image vectors by stacking their columns (or rows). The resulting image vectors generally lead to a highdimensional image vector space. In such a space, calculating the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix is a critical problem deserving consideration. When the number of training samples is smaller than the dimension of images, the singular value decomposition (SVD) technique is useful for reducing the computational complexity [1-4]. However, when the training sample size becomes large, the SVD technique is helpless. To deal with this problem, an incremental principal component analysis (IPCA) technique has been proposed recently [16]. But, the efficiency of this algorithm still depends on the distribution of data. Over the last few years, two PCA-related methods, independent component analysis (ICA) [17] and kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) [18, 19] have been of wide concern. Bartlett [20], Yuen [21], Liu [22], and Draper [23] proposed using ICA for face representation and found that it was better than PCA when cosine was used as the similarity measure (however, the performance difference between ICA and PCA was not significant if the Euclidean distance is used [23]). Yang [24] and Liu [25] used KPCA for face feature extraction and recognition and showed that KPCA outperforms the classical PCA. Like PCA, ICA and KPCA both follow the matrix-to-vector mapping strategy when they are used for image analysis and, their algorithms are more complex than PCA. So, ICA and KPCA are considered to be computationally more expensive than PCA. The experimental results in 16

A Statistical PCA Method for Face Recognition

Face recognition using laplacianfaces.

Discriminant Common Vectors in Principal Component Analysis Transformed Space for Face Recognition

Weighted Modular 2 DPCA-Based Face Recognition from a Single Sample Image Per Class

Bi-2DPCA: A Fast Face Coding Method for Recognition

Patch-Based Principal Component Analysis for Face Recognition

Discuss and Research of Face Recognition Based on PCA Algorithm

Face Recognition Experiment Based on Principal Components and Independent Components

Image PCA: A New Approach for Face Recognition

An Improved Face Recognition Algorithm Based on Skin-Color Detection

Face recognition based on the second-order two-dimensional PCA method

2D-PCA Representation and Sparse Representation for Image Recognition

Face Recognition Method Based on Two-Directional and Modular Fuzzy 2DPCA

A face recognition software framework based on principal component analysis

Face Recognition Method Based on 2Dpca-Lp

Face Recognition Method Based on 2DPCA and Compressive Sensing

(2D)(2)pca: Two-Directional Two-Dimensional Pca for Efficient Face Representation and Recognition

Dynamically optimizing face recognition using PCA

An efficient method for face recognition under varying illumination

Feature Recognition of Face with Real-Time Variations Using Eigen Face Approach Methodology with PCA Algorithm

Facial Expression Recognition Based on the Optimal Matching of Multi-feature and Multi-classifier