Abstract:Measuring inconsistency is crucial to effective inconsistency management in software development. A complete measurement of inconsistency should focus on not only the degree but also the significance of inconsistency. However, most of the approaches available only take the degree of inconsistency into account. The significance of inconsistency has not yet been given much needed consideration. This paper presents an approach for measuring the significance of inconsistency arising from different viewpoints in the Viewpoints framework. We call an individual set of requirements belonging to different viewpoints a combined requirements collection in this paper. We argue that the significance of inconsistency arising in a combined requirements collection is closely associated with global priority levels of requirements involved in the inconsistency. Here we assume that the global priority level of an individual requirement captures the relative importance of every viewpoint including this requirement as well as the local priority level of the requirement within the viewpoint. Then we use the synthesis of global priority levels of all the requirements in a combined collection to measure the significance of the collection. Following this, we present a scoring matrix function to measure the significance of inconsistency in an inconsistent combined requirements collection, which describes the contribution made by each subset of the requirements collection to the significance of the set of requirements involved in the inconsistency. An ordering relationship between inconsistencies of two combined requirements collections, termed more significant than, is also presented by comparing their significance scoring matrix functions. Finally, these techniques were implemented in a prototype tool called IncMeasurer, which we developed as a proof of concept.

Identifying Acceptable Common Proposals for Handling Inconsistent Software Requirements

An Approach to Generating Proposals for Handling Inconsistent Software Requirements

Evaluating Proposals for Handling Inconsistency in Requirements

A Blame-Based Approach to Generating Proposals for Handling Inconsistency in Software Requirements

A Measurement-Driven Process Model for Managing Inconsistent Software Requirements

Handling Inconsistency in Distributed Software Requirements Specifications Based on Prioritized Merging

A Priority-Based Negotiations Approach for Handling Inconsistencies in Multi-Perspective Software Requirements

From Inconsistency Handling to Non-Canonical Requirements Management: A Logical Perspective

Measuring Inconsistency in Requirements Specifications

Measuring the Significance of Inconsistency in the Viewpoints Framework

Managing Non-Canonical Software Requirements

Ontology-Based inconsistency management of software requirements specifications

Approaches to Measuring Inconsistency for Stratified Knowledge Bases

Requirement Consistency and Integrity Verification Method based on Natural Language Processing

Detecting of Requirements Inconsistency: an Ontology-Based Approach

Inconsistency Management of Role Base Access Control Policy

Inconsistency-based strategy for clarifying vague software requirements

Inconsistency Resolution Method for RBAC Based Interoperation

Managing Software Requirements Changes Based on Negotiation-Style Revision

Automated Inconsistency Analysis of Real-Time Requirements: A Domain Expert Friendly Approach.

Integrating Incomplete Preference Estimation and Consistency Control in Consensus Reaching