Abstract:Mutual-information maximization is one of the most popular algorithms for automatic image registration. However, many implementation issues have not been evaluated in a single, coherent context. Methods: Twenty-one registrations between MR and SPECT brain images (8 patients) were achieved by mutual-information maximization with different implementation strategies. The results of a popular strategy were chosen as the standard. All other results were compared with the standard, and the statistics of misregistrations were computed. The registration speed, accuracy, precision, and success rate were assessed. Results: Compared with trilinear interpolation, nearest-neighbor interpolation slightly sped the registration process, but with a lower success rate. The number of bins used to estimate the probability density function (pdf) affects the speed and robustness. Using fewer bins yielded a less robust registration. Adaptively changing the number of bins increased the registration speed and robustness. Simplex optimization increased the registration speed considerably, with a slightly degraded success rate. Simplex optimization with adaptive bin strategy improved the success rate and further decreased the registration time. Multiresolution optimization yielded a better success rate, with little effect on the accuracy and precision of registration. An increase in the number of resolution levels increased the success rate. Multisampling optimization also improved the success rate, but the results were less accurate and precise than those obtained with multiresolution optimization, with an increase in the number of levels decreasing the performance. Segmentation affected the registration speed and success rate. Because segmentation is problem specific, the effects were not conclusive. Conclusion: Different implementation strategies considerably affect the performance of automatic image registration by mutual-information maximization. On the basis of the experimental findings, we suggest that the best implementation strategy would include trilinear interpolation, adaptive change of the number of bins when estimating pdf, and exploitation of a simplex optimization algorithm with a multiresolution scheme.

A More Robust Method for Multi-modality Medical Image Registration

Non-rigid Registration of Multimodality Medical Images Based on ITK

Regional Weighted Mutual Information For Multimodal Rigid Registration

Medical Image Elastic Registration Based on Contour and Feature Points

Study on the Method of Medical Rigid Image Registration Based on Mutual Information

Influence of Implementation Parameters on Registration of Mr and Spect Brain Images by Maximization of Mutual Information

Registration Method for CT-MR Image Based on Mutual Information

Multi-modality Medical Image Registration Using Support Vector Machines.

A Hybrid Optimization Method for Maximum Mutual Information Registration

Multi-Modal Image Registration Based on Multi-Feature Mutual Information

Non-rigid multi-modal medical image registration by combining L-BFGS-B with cat swarm optimization

Non-Rigid Multi-Modal 3D Medical Image Registration Based on Foveated Modality Independent Neighborhood Descriptor.

An automatic registration approach for whole body PET images and head MR images

A Hybrid Method for Medical Image Registration Based on Multi-resolution Analysis

Multimodality Medical Image Registration Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization

An Improved 2D-3D Medical Image Registration Algorithm Based on Modified Mutual Information and Expanded Powell Method

Multimodality Medical Image Registration Based on Dividing Rectangles

Medical Image Registration-Based on Methodologies of Mutual Information, Wavelet Decomposition, and Hybrid Optimization

Nonrigid Registration of Multimodal Medical Images Based on Hybrid Model

Enhanced Mutual Information-Based Medical Image Registration Using a Hybrid Optimisation Technique

3D registration of MR image sequence of human brain based on normalized mutual information