Abstract:BackgroundA widely-used approach for screening nuclear DNA markers is to obtain sequence data and use bioinformatic algorithms to estimate which two alleles are present in heterozygous individuals. It is common practice to omit unresolved genotypes from downstream analyses, but the implications of this have not been investigated. We evaluated the haplotype reconstruction method implemented by PHASE in the context of phylogeographic applications. Empirical sequence datasets from five non-coding nuclear loci with gametic phase ascribed by molecular approaches were coupled with simulated datasets to investigate three key issues: (1) haplotype reconstruction error rates and the nature of inference errors, (2) dataset features and genotypic configurations that drive haplotype reconstruction uncertainty, and (3) impacts of omitting unresolved genotypes on levels of observed phylogenetic diversity and the accuracy of downstream phylogeographic analyses.ResultsWe found that PHASE usually had very low false-positives (i.e., a low rate of confidently inferring haplotype pairs that were incorrect). The majority of genotypes that could not be resolved with high confidence included an allele occurring only once in a dataset, and genotypic configurations involving two low-frequency alleles were disproportionately represented in the pool of unresolved genotypes. The standard practice of omitting unresolved genotypes from downstream analyses can lead to considerable reductions in overall phylogenetic diversity that is skewed towards the loss of alleles with larger-than-average pairwise sequence divergences, and in turn, this causes systematic bias in estimates of important population genetic parameters.ConclusionsA combination of experimental and computational approaches for resolving phase of segregating sites in phylogeographic applications is essential. We outline practical approaches to mitigating potential impacts of computational haplotype reconstruction on phylogeographic inferences. With targeted application of laboratory procedures that enable unambiguous phase determination via physical isolation of alleles from diploid PCR products, relatively little investment of time and effort is needed to overcome the observed biases.

Phasing and Missing Data Recovery in Family Trios

Genotype Calling and Haplotyping in Parent-Offspring Trios

Haplotype Reconstruction and Estimation of Haplotype Frequencies from Nuclear Families with Only One Parent Available

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Haplotype Frequencies in Trio Pedigrees

Haplotyping and Haplotype Frequency Estimates on Trio Genotype Data

A General Approach for Haplotype Phasing across the Full Spectrum of Relatedness

Inferring Haplotype/disease Association by Joint Use of Case-Parents Trios and Case-Parent Pairs.

TrioMDR: Detecting SNP Interactions in Trio Families with Model-Based Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction.

An efficient study design to test parent-of-origin effects in family trios.

Detecting Disease Variants in Case-Parent Trio Studies Using the Bioconductor Software Package Trio

A Method for Haplotype Inference in General Pedigrees Without Recombination

Nuclear gene phylogeography using PHASE: dealing with unresolved genotypes, lost alleles, and systematic bias in parameter estimation

Efficient Simulation of Epistatic Interactions in Case-Parent Trios

Genetic polyploid phasing from low-depth progeny samples

A Fast and Flexible Statistical Model for Large-Scale Population Genotype Data: Applications to Inferring Missing Genotypes and Haplotypic Phase

Accurate genome-wide phasing from IBD data

Benefits and Limits of Phasing Alleles for Network Inference of Allopolyploid Complexes

PolyCluster: Minimum Fragment Disagreement Clustering for Polyploid Phasing

An Integrated Approach for Copy Number Variation Discovery in Parent-Offspring Trios.

The Missing Person problem through the lens of information theory

Joint detection of copy number variations in parent-offspring trios.