Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this exploratory paper is to analyze how complexity of an artifact affects designing processes of its mechanical, electric, and software sub‐systems. Design/methodology/approach Based on existing empirical research and frameworks of axiomatic design, product architecture, and product development process, the paper proposes a simple model of functional and structural design to examine how engineers' ways of thinking differ among mechanical, electric and software engineers. Findings This paper argues that products and artifacts tend to become complex (often with integral architecture) when customers' functional requirements become more demanding and societal/technological constraints become stricter, and that complex mechanical products are often accompanied by electronic control units with complex functions. This implies that designing complex mechanical products often requires intensive coordination among mechanical, electric and software engineers. This, however, is not easy, as engineers' way of thinking is often different among the three areas: mechanical engineers want to complete structural design information first to build prototypes; electrical and software engineers (the latter in particular) request complete functional information first. Research limitations/implications In order to solve the above‐mentioned mechanical‐electrical‐software coordination problem, engineers need to share basic design concept of the product in question. Heavy‐weight product managers who infuse the product concept to the project members might be the key to this coordination. Companies may need to make sure that their product development processes are friendly to all of the three groups of engineers. Originality/value Although designing complex artifacts has been a popular research theme since H. Simon's seminal work, issues of organizational coordination for developing complex products, with increasing managerial importance, need further research. With an empirical case of the automobile and electronic products, the present paper is unique in that it combines frameworks of product development processes, product architectures, and organizational capabilities.

Towards an Understanding of Decision Complexity in IT Configuration

The Design of an Autonomic Computing Model and the Algorithm for Decision-Making.

Conceptual Model and Realization Methods of Autonomic Computing

Research of Autonomic Software Based on Complexity

Modeling air traffic controllers' decision making processes with relational complexity network

Multi-Attribute Decision Making with Einstein Aggregation Operators in Complex Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Hypersoft Environments

Model-based System Configuration Approach for Internetware

A Decision-Making Approach for the Evaluation of Information Security Management under Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Environment

State-Based Generalized Autonomic Computing Models

An Empirical Taxonomy of the Decision-Making Processes Concerning Strategic Applications of Information Systems

Testing Configurable Component-Based Software - Configuration Test Modeling and Complexity Analysis.

Computational Models of Human Decision-Making with Application to the Internet of Everything

Complexity and control: benchmarking of automobiles and electronic products

Decision-Theoretic Control of Problem Solving: Principles and Architecture

Complexity evaluation of network configurations and abstractions

Modelling Autonomic and Dynamic Trust Decision-Making Mechanism for Large-Scale Open Environments

Product Complexity Management Enabled by a Model-Based Approach

A Review of Intelligent Configuration and Its Security for Complex Networks

Characteristics and Generation Mechanism of Decision-Making Scenarios Based on System Complexity

Determining Air Traffic Complexity – Challenges and Future Development

A real-time interactive decision-making and control framework for complex cyber-physical-human systems