Abstract:Each corporate growth project is an option, in the sense that managers face choices--push ahead or pull back--along the way. Yet many companies hesitate to apply options theory to initiatives such as R&D and geographic expansion, partly because these "real" options are highly complex. In this article, the authors make the case that the complexity of real options can be eased through the use of a binomial valuation model. Many of the problems with real-options analysis stem from the use of the Black-Scholes-Merton model, which isn't suited to real options. Binomial models, by contrast, are simpler mathematically, and you can tinker with a binomial model until it closely reflects the project you wish to value. Suppose your company is considering investing in a new plant. To use the binomial model, you must create an "event tree" to figure out the full range of possible values for the plant during the project's lifetime--next year, at the end of the design phase, upon completion. Then you work backward from the value at completion, factoring in the various investments, to determine the value of the project today. These calculations provide you with numbers for all the possible future values of the option at the various points where a decision needs to be made on whether to continue with the project. The authors also address another criticism of real options: that gaps often arise between theoretical and realized values of options of all types. Such gaps may be largely the result of managers exercising options at the wrong time. To improve the way it manages its real options, a company can look out for the decision trigger points that correspond to the nodes on a binomial decision tree. The trigger points should not only tell managers when they need to decide on exercise but also specify rules governing the exercise decisions.

A Real Options Design for Quality Control Charts

Valuing Operational Flexibility in Manufacturing Systems Using Real Options

A Real Options Design for Product Outsourcing

Process Quality Control Through Bayesian Optimization with Adaptive Local Convergence

REAL OPTION MODELS FOR MANAGING MANUFACTURING SYSTEM CHANGES IN THE NEW ECONOMY

A Real-Options-based Analysis for Supply Chain Decisions

An Integrated Optimization Model Of Control Chart And Preventive Maintenance Policies For Non-Normal Data

Efficient Design and Sensitivity Analysis of Control Charts Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Process Adjustment with an Asymmetric Quality Loss Function

A Markov Model for Quality Control Plan Selection

Robust LQ optimal controller designing for refining process

Application of Real Options in Project Portfolio Selection

QUALITY-ORIENTED SHEWHART CONTROL CHARTS DESIGN VIA STATISTICAL TOLERANCING

Design Optimization of Control Charts Based on Taguchi's Quality Loss Function

Two-stage Approach to Causality Analysis-Based Quality Problem Solving for Discrete Manufacturing Systems

A quality monitoring and decision‐making scheme for automated production processes

Optimization Design of X-bar Chart and Preventive Maintenance Policies

Supply chain modeling: a real options design for product outsourcing

Life Cycle Management Method for Smart Grid Asset with Real Option Theory

A real-world way to manage real options