Abstract:DddA-derived cytosine base editors (DdCBEs) enable the targeted introduction of C·G-to-T·A conversions in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). DdCBEs are often deployed as pairs, with each arm comprised of a transcription activator-like effector (TALE), a split double-stranded DNA deaminase half, and a uracil glycosylase inhibitor. This pioneering technology has helped improve our understanding of cellular processes involving mtDNA and has paved the way for the development of models and therapies for genetic disorders caused by pathogenic mtDNA variants. Nonetheless, given the intrinsic properties of TALE proteins, several target sites in human mtDNA remain out of reach to DdCBEs and other TALE-based technologies. Specifically, due to the conventional requirement for a thymine immediately upstream of the TALE target sequences (i.e., the 5′-T constraint), over 150 loci in the human mitochondrial genome are presumed to be inaccessible to DdCBEs. Previous attempts at circumventing this constraint, either by developing monomeric DdCBEs or utilizing DNA-binding domains alternative to TALEs, have resulted in suboptimal specificity profiles with reduced therapeutic potential. Here, aiming to challenge and elucidate the relevance of the 5′-T constraint in the context of DdCBE-mediated mtDNA editing, and to expand the range of motifs that are editable by this technology, we generated αDdCBEs that contain modified TALE proteins engineered to recognize all 5′ bases. Notably, 5′-T-noncompliant, canonical DdCBEs efficiently edited mtDNA at diverse loci. However, DdCBEs were frequently outperformed by αDdCBEs, which consistently displayed significant improvements in activity and specificity, regardless of the 5′-most bases of their TALE binding sites. Furthermore, we showed that αDdCBEs are compatible with DddAtox and its derivatives DddA6, and DddA11, and we validated TALE shifting with αDdCBEs as an effective approach to optimize base editing outcomes at a single target site. Overall, αDdCBEs enable efficient, specific, and unconstrained mitochondrial base editing.

Mitochondrial base editor DdCBE causes substantial DNA off-target editing in nuclear genome of embryos

Mitochondrial base editor induces substantial nuclear off-target mutations

Genome editing induces the transfer of mitochondrial DNA into the nuclear genome

Transfer of mitochondrial DNA into the nuclear genome during gene editing

Transfer of Mitochondrial DNA into the Nuclear Genome During Induced DNA Breaks

Harnessing accurate mitochondrial DNA base editing mediated by DdCBEs in a predictable manner

Adenine base editors induce off-target structure variations in mouse embryos and primary human T cells

Engineered mitochondrial A-to-G editors with enhanced efficiency and targeting scope

A DddA ortholog-based and transactivator-assisted nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine base editors with expanded target compatibility

Unconstrained Precision Mitochondrial Genome Editing with αDdCBEs

Engineering RsDddA as mitochondrial base editor with wide target compatibility and enhanced activity

Secondary follicles enable efficient germline mitochondrial DNA base editing at hard-to-edit site

Precision mitochondrial DNA editing with high-fidelity DddA-derived base editors

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases

Developing Mitochondrial Base Editors with Diverse Context Compatibility and High Fidelity Via Saturated Spacer Library

Cytosine base editors induce off-target mutations and adverse phenotypic effects in transgenic mice

Mitochondrial DNA editing in mice with DddA-TALE fusion deaminases

Strand-selective base editing of human mitochondrial DNA using mitoBEs

Eliminating Base-Editor-induced Genome-Wide and Transcriptome-Wide Off-Target Mutations

C-to-G editing generates double-strand breaks causing deletion, transversion and translocation

Precision modeling of mitochondrial diseases in zebrafish via DdCBE-mediated mtDNA base editing