Improved Satisfaction While Maintaining Safety and High Time in Range (TIR) With a Medtronic Investigational Enhanced Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System (e-AHCL)

Cheng Yi Yuan,Yee W Kong,Tess Amoore,Katrin Brown,Benyamin Grosman,Alicia Jenkins,Hannah Jones,Natalie Kurtz,Melissa H Lee,Richard MacIsaac,Emma Netzer,Barbora Paldus,Lesley Robinson,Anirban Roy,Catriona M Sims,Steven Trawley,Sara Vogrin,David N O'Neal,Yee W. Kong,Melissa H. Lee,Catriona M. Sims,David N. O’Neal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-2217
2024-02-21
Diabetes Care
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To determine feasibility and compare acceptance of an investigational Medtronic enhanced Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (e-AHCL) system in adults with type 1 diabetes with earlier iterations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Nonrandomized three-stage (12 weeks each) exploratory study comparing e-AHCL (Bluetooth-enabled MiniMed 780G insulin pump with automatic data upload [780G] incorporating an updated algorithm; calibration-free all-in-one disposable sensor; 7-day infusion set) preceded by a run-in (non-Bluetooth 780G [670G V4.0 insulin pump] requiring manual data upload; Guardian Sensor 3 [GS3] requiring calibration; 3-day infusion set), stage 1 (780G; GS3; 3-day infusion set), and stage 2 (780G; calibration-free Guardian Sensor 4; 3-day infusion set). Treatment satisfaction was assessed by Diabetes Technology Questionnaire (DTQ)-current (primary outcome) and other validated treatment satisfaction tools with glucose outcomes by continuous glucose monitoring metrics. RESULTS Twenty-one of 22 (11 women) participants (baseline HbA1c 6.7%/50 mmol/mol) completed the study. DTQ-current scores favored e-AHCL (123.1 [17.8]) versus run-in (101.6 [24.2]) and versus stage 1 (110.6 [20.8]) (both P < 0.001) but did not differ from stage 2 (119.4 [16.0]; P = 0.271). Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire short-form scores for “Convenience and Efficacy” favored e-AHCL over run-in and all stages. Percent time in range 70–180 mg/dL was greater with e-AHCL versus run-in and stage 2 (+2.9% and +3.6%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Percent times of <70 mg/dL for e-AHCL were significantly lower than run-in, stage 1, and stage 2 (−0.9%, −0.6%, and −0.5%, respectively; all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS e-AHCL was feasible. User satisfaction increased compared with earlier Medtronic HCL iterations without compromising glucose control.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?