Abstract:Background Biofeedback allows the individual to gain awareness and directly control a biomechanical or biological variable of interest. The biofeedback of postural performance has aroused a great interest of Rehabilitation Sciences due to its potential impact on the control of postural stability. While it is well established that biofeedback seems to limit body movements in orthostatism, it is not clear whether such a postural strategy occurs at the cost of increasing the level of muscle activity and whether it differs between different biofeedback techniques applied to postural control. Objectives This study is aimed at investigating the effect of different types of biofeedback techniques on the level of muscle activity postural sway during standing. Methods Three adults were tested in three standing conditions: (1) eyes open (EO); (2) biofeedback of acceleration (BFac), consisting of reducing the linear acceleration of the trunk in the anteroposterior (AP) direction; (3) biofeedback of laser (BFlaser), consisting of pointing a laser as close as possible to a target from the right wrist. The acceleration components were collected through a triaxial accelerometer (TrignoTM Wireless EMG System Overview, Delsys, USA; ±2g), positioned roughly at L5 level, and the variability (standard deviation) calculated in the AP direction. Surface electromyograms (EMG) were collected from the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally from the Trigno system (1.926Hz). The EMG's RMS amplitude was obtained to evaluate the degree of muscle excitation. Due to the small sample size, the statistical analysis involves data description by means of median (minimum – maximum). Results In relation to EO (8.41, 7.56 – 8.98 gx10-3), the standard deviation of ACAP reduced with BFac (median, min-max: 7.82, 4.32 – 11.45 gx10-3) and increased with BFlaser (9.83, 6.50 – 11.01 gx10-3). For the right body side, the RMS of TA increased with the biofeedback (BFac: 6.33, 2.99 – 9.67rms; BFlaser: 6.11, 2.31 – 8.32rms) when compared to EO (5.07, 2.11 – 7.16 rms). For the MG, while RMS was smaller with BFac (5.53, 2.95 – 17.84 rms), the RMS was higher with BFlaser (7.35, 2.93 – 16.95 rms) in relation to EO (6.63, 2.51 – 23.92 rms). For the left side, both ankle muscles showed a smaller RMS with BFac (TA: 4.29, 3,70 – 7.07rms; MG: 6.22, 2.53 – 10.93rms) and with BFlaser (TA: 3.59, 2,32 – 3.59rms; MG: 6.90, 2.38 – 15.44rms) do que EO (TA: 5.18, 4.50 – 6.70rms; MG: 8.31, 2.01 – 23.29rms). Conclusion These qualitative considerations indicate BFac seems to reduce the size of postural sway, while BFlaser increases it during standing balance, when compared to EO. Furthermore, an asymmetric postural activation was revealed regardless of biofeedback. TA and MG seem to reduce the level of muscle excitation at left, while they are more active at right. Implications Findings suggest that EMGs may provide different estimates of muscle arousal if collected unilaterally during upright posture with biofeedback. Ongoing study with more individuals to advance knowledge about the potential of biofeedback in improving postural control and reducing the risk of falling.

THE EFFECT OF ILIOPSOAS MYOFASCIAL RELEASE ON POSTURAL balance in futsal athletes

Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review

The Acute Effects in Postural Sway as a Result of Self-Myofascial Release on the Lower Extremities in Collegiate Female Athletes

The Effects of Different Myofascial Release Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion, and Muscle Strength in Athletes With Iliotibial Band Tightness: A Randomized Controlled Study

Acute Effects of Myofascial Release on Foot Mobility and Performance in Basketball Players with Hypomobile Feet—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of two exercise programmes on joint position sense, dynamic balance and countermovement jump in male amateur football players. A randomised controlled trial

The fatigue effect of a simulated futsal match protocol on sprint performance and kinematics of the lower limbs

Proprioceptive Training on Dynamic Neuromuscular Control in Fencers: A Clinical Trial

Unlocking the Potential: Increasing Muscle Strength in Lower Limbs of Youth Soccer Players over Five Weeks through Mat Pilates Training—A Pilot Study

Effects of core strengthening on balance in university judo athletes

EFECTO DE EJERCICIOS FIFA 11+ SOBRE EL BALANCE POSTURAL ESTÁTICO EN FUTBOLISTAS

Exploring Injury Prevention Strategies for Futsal Players: A Systematic Review

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF BIOFEEDBACK ON THE LEVEL OF MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING STANDING BALANCE

Effect of 30 pilates sessions on body posture, perception and dynamic balance in healthy women

Investigation of the functional and biomechanical effect of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique in individuals with asymptomatic dynamic knee valgus - Randomized controlled trial

Comparison of muscle activity, strength, and balance, before and after a 6-month training using the FIFA11+ program (part 2)

REPERCUSSIONS OF BALANCE TRAINING ON SOCCER PLAYERS’ LOWER LIMB INJURIES

The Impact of Fascial Manipulation® on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Asymptomatic Handball Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinic- and laboratory-based measures of postural control in patellofemoral pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis and evidence gap map

Effects of dominance and vision on unipedal balance tests in futsal players using a triaxial accelerometer

Myofascial Release Effects in Teachers' Posture, Muscle Tension and Voice Quality: A Randomized Controlled Trial