A qualitative study to understand the Duchenne muscular dystrophy experience from the parent/patient perspective
Victoria Brown,Elizabeth Merikle,Kelly Johnston,Katherine Gooch,Ivana Audhya,Linda Lowes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00669-6
2023-12-12
Abstract:Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severe, fatal neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive atrophy and muscle weakness, resulting in loss of ambulation, decreased upper body function, and impaired cardiorespiratory function. This study aimed to generate qualitative evidence to describe the primary symptoms and impacts of DMD in ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients as reported by patient/caregiver dyads. Information was also gathered on expectations for future DMD treatments. Methods: Forty-six dyads (caregiver and patients with DMD aged 4 to 22 years) participated in 60-min semi-structured video interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Differences in experiences with DMD by ambulation status were examined. Results: Mean ages of ambulatory (n = 28) and non-ambulatory participants (n = 18) were 8.7 and 11.3 years, respectively, with an average age of diagnosis of 3.7 years (SD = 2.3). The primary symptoms reported by both groups were lack of strength (ambulatory: n = 28, 100.0%; non-ambulatory: n = 17, 94.4%) and fatigue (ambulatory: n = 24, 85.7%; non-ambulatory: n = 14, 77.8%). Physical function was the domain that was most impacted by DMD, with participants describing progressive decline of physical function due to loss of physical strength as the primary defining feature of the disease across all stages of ambulatory ability. For those who maintained ambulatory ability at the time of the interview, physical function impacts described impaired mobility (e.g., climbing stairs: n = 16, 57.1%; running: n = 13, 46.4%), impaired upper body function, in particular fine motor skills like holding a pen/pencil or buttoning clothes (n = 17, 60.7%), problem with transfers (e.g., getting off the floor: n = 10, 35.7%), and activities of daily living (ADLs; n = 15, 53.6%). For non-ambulatory participants, the functional impacts most frequently described were problems with transfers (e.g., getting in/out of bed: n = 13, 72.2%; getting in/out of chair or position in bed: both n = 10, 55.6%), impaired upper body function (reaching: n = 14, 77.8%), and ADLs (n = 15, 83.3%). Meaningful treatment goals differed by ambulatory status; for ambulatory participants, goals included maintaining current functioning (n = 20, 71.4%), improving muscle strength (n = 7, 25.9%), and reducing fatigue (n = 6, 22.2%). For non-ambulatory participants, these included increased upper body strength (n = 8, 42.1%) and greater independence in ADLs (n = 6, 31.6%). A preliminary conceptual model was developed to illustrate the primary symptoms and physical function impacts of DMD and capture their relationship to disease progression. Conclusion: This study contributes to the limited qualitative literature by characterizing impacts of physical limitations and symptoms of DMD on disease progression and thus providing insights into the lived experience with DMD. Differences in treatment goals were also identified based on ambulatory status. Taken together, these findings can help inform patient-centered measurement strategies for evaluating outcomes in DMD clinical research.