Unstructured linker regions play a role in the differential splicing activities of paralogous RNA binding proteins PTBP1 and PTBP2

Anthony Truong,Michael Barton,Uyenphuong Tran,Montana Mellody,Devon Berger,Dean Madory,Elizabeth Hitch,Basma Jibrael,Nikolas Nikolaidis,Tyler Luchko,Niroshika Keppetipola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105733
IF: 5.485
2024-02-01
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:RNA Binding Proteins regulate, in part, alternative pre-mRNA splicing and, in turn, gene expression patterns. Polypyrimidine tract binding proteins PTBP1 and PTBP2 are paralogous RNA binding proteins sharing 74% amino acid sequence identity. Both proteins contain four structured RNA-recognition motifs (RRMs) connected by linker regions and an N-terminal region. Despite their similarities, the paralogs have distinct tissue-specific expression patterns and can regulate discrete sets of target exons. How two highly structurally similar proteins can exert different splicing outcomes is not well understood. Previous studies revealed that PTBP2 is post-translationally phosphorylated in the unstructured N-terminal, Linker 1, and Linker 2 regions that share less sequence identity with PTBP1 signifying a role for these regions in dictating the paralog's distinct splicing activities. To this end, we conducted bioinformatics analysis to determine the evolutionary conservation of RRMs versus linker regions in PTBP1 and PTBP2 across species. To determine the role of PTBP2 unstructured regions in splicing activity, we created hybrid PTBP1-PTBP2 constructs that had counterpart PTBP1 regions swapped to an otherwise PTBP2 protein and assayed on differentially regulated exons. We also conducted molecular dynamics studies to investigate how negative charges introduced by phosphorylation in PTBP2 unstructured regions can alter their physical properties. Collectively, results from our studies reveal an important role for PTBP2 unstructured regions and suggest a role for phosphorylation in the differential splicing activities of the paralogs on certain regulated exons.
biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?