Comparative and modeling study of the difference in failure mechanisms of cyclic and monotonic pneumatic fracturing of granite

Cunbao Li,Bowen Liu,Heping Xie,Jianjun Hu,Xiting Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.102935

IF: 4.566

2024-05-01

Geothermics

Abstract:This paper conducted comparative tests of cyclic and monotonic pneumatic fracturing under three stress limits. The granite fracture initiation pressure is reduced by 18%–25% under cyclic pneumatic fracturing compared with that under monotonic pneumatic fracturing, producing wider fractures and tending to form more complex fracture networks. In monotonic pneumatic fracturing, the number of acoustic emission (AE) events and the AE energy level are low before the granite failure. In cyclic pneumatic fracturing, frequent micro-fracturing activities occur in each cycle with more moderate energy release. Micro-tensile cracks dominated the entire process of granite failure. Cyclic pneumatic fracturing produces more shear fractures than monotonic fracturing does, which explains the more complex fracture networks generated by cyclic pneumatic fracturing. Under the different number of cycles, the b value of AE decreases with the reduction in cycles, the proportion of small-amplitude AE events declines, and more high-energy and large-scale damages occur. In consideration of the influence of cyclic effects and gas diffusion, the granite fracturing mechanism under cyclic pneumatic fracturing was described by introducing the damage factor and damage transfer coefficient ς to establish a model of fracture initiation pressure. This approach effectively predicted the fracture initiation pressure of granite under various cycles.

energy & fuels,geosciences, multidisciplinary