Exploring the association between post–critical incident intervention preferences and self‐reported coping self‐efficacy among firefighters

Joselyn R. Sarabia,Elinam Dellor,Bridget Freisthler,Katherine Kieninger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23029
2024-03-14
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Abstract:Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) is a commonly utilized intervention in the fire service that aims to minimize psychological harm and adverse mental health outcomes after a potentially traumatic incident. This study aimed to explore firefighter preferences regarding CISD and alternative post–critical incident interventions in relation to firefighter coping self‐efficacy (FFCSE) and trauma coping self‐efficacy (CSE‐T). Firefighters (N = 241) completed an online survey and provided complete data. Most participants were White (n = 203, 84.2%), non‐Hispanic (n = 221, 91.7%) men (94.2%; n = 227). CISD was the most preferred intervention among firefighters (n = 113, 46.9%) as compared to informal peer support (n = 31, 12.9%), formal one‐on‐one counseling (n = 29, 12.0%), and no intervention (n = 68, 28.2%). Firefighters who preferred CISD had statistically significant lower levels of FFCSE, R2 = .033–.044, ps = .012–.030, and CSE‐T, R2 = .035–.061 ps = .017–.024, compared to those who preferred no intervention. Firefighters who preferred formal one‐on‐one counseling had statistically significantly lower levels of FFCSE, R2 = .033–.044, ps = .003–.011, and CSE‐T, R2 = .035–0.061, p
psychiatry,psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?