A survey of iron supplementation, iron status surveillance, and erythropoiesis stimulating agent use in level III NICUs in the United States

Jared J. Tuttle,Timothy M. Bahr,Sarah M. Tweddell,Robert D. Christensen,Robin K. Ohls
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-01950-2
2024-04-25
Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:Multiple studies involving term infants report associations between iron deficiency and poor neurodevelopment [1]. Few studies have investigated this in preterm infants. There are many uncertainties about best practices for assuring iron sufficiency among preterm infants. The purpose of our study was to better understand the practices being used in the USA to prevent iron deficiency in preterm infants. We aimed to: (1) estimate the proportion of NICUs routinely providing enteral and intravenous iron supplementation to preterm patients, (2) summarize typical doses used, and (3) summarize the frequency of routine use of various iron status biomarkers and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). To generate a probability sample of NICUs, we obtained a publicly available, curated list of level III NICUs in the United States generated in collaboration with the AAP Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine and continuously updated (Scott Snyder, personal communication). We stratified units by their designation as "academic/university-affiliated" vs. "not academically affiliated" and by geographic region and selected a stratified random sample. To estimate proportions with a margin of error of 10% with 95% confidence, a sample size of 60 units was needed.
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?