Trends in clinical management of lactational mastitis among women attending Australian general practice: a national longitudinal study using MedicineInsight, 2011-2022

Grzeskowiak,L. E.,Kunnel,A.,Crawford,S. B.,Cullinane,M.,Amir,L. H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080128
IF: 3.006
2024-05-22
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective To examine longitudinal trends in clinical management of lactational mastitis in women attending general practice. Design Open cohort study. Setting Australian general practice using data from MedicineInsight. Participants Women aged 18 to 44 years with one or more clinical encounters for lactational mastitis between January 2011 and July 2022. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the proportion of prescribed oral antibiotics based on the antibiotic type. Secondary outcome measures were the proportion of women prescribed other medications (eg, antifungals, lactation suppressants) or ordered selected clinical investigations including breast ultrasound, blood test, breast milk culture, nipple swab culture or breast aspirate. Outcomes were examined based on the calendar year and individual- or clinical practice-level characteristics. Results Among 25 002 women who had one or more clinical encounters related to mastitis, 90.9% were prescribed oral antibiotics. While the proportion of women prescribed an oral antibiotic remained consistent from 2011 to 2022 (91.1% vs 92.5%), there were changes in the proportion receiving prescriptions for di/flucloxacillin (46.1% vs 60.4%) and cefalexin (38.6% vs 26.5%). Fewer than 12% of women were clinically investigated for their mastitis encounter, most commonly a breast ultrasound (7.1%), followed by a selected blood test (3.8%). Requests for breast milk cultures, nipple swab cultures or breast aspirates occurred in less than 1.1% of individuals. Significant increases were evident with respect to ordering of all clinical investigations, with rates at least doubling between 2011 and 2022 (6.6% vs 14.7%). Large variability in clinical management was evident according to both individual- (eg, concessional status) and clinical practice-level characteristics (eg, remoteness). Conclusions Australian general practitioners commonly prescribe oral antibiotics to women with mastitis and largely in line with clinical guidelines. Their use of clinical investigations as part of mastitis management has increased over the last decade.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of analyzing the clinical management trends of lactational mastitis in general practices in Australia from 2011 to 2022. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Evaluate the trends in antibiotic prescriptions**: The study primarily focuses on the proportion and changes in oral antibiotic prescriptions, particularly the use of different types of antibiotics such as cephalosporins and flucloxacillin. 2. **Evaluate the use of other treatment measures**: This includes the use of other medications such as antifungal agents and lactation suppressants, as well as the use of clinical examinations like breast ultrasound, blood tests, milk culture, nipple swab culture, or breast aspiration. 3. **Analyze individual and clinic-level differences in clinical management**: The study explores the impact of factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and geographic location on the clinical management of mastitis. Through these analyses, the study aims to understand whether the clinical management of lactational mastitis in general practices in Australia aligns with clinical guidelines and whether there have been improvements over the past 10 years. Additionally, the study examines the differences in management among different patients and clinics to identify opportunities for further standardization of clinical care.