Abstract:Purpose Participation in global value chains (GVCs) is increasingly related to the economic growth of any country. The conceivable beneficial impact of GVCs on economic growth differs across countries and could be modified with the countries' domestic institutional arrangements. However, ignoring the complementarity between the components of institutional quality led to ignorance of the institutional imbalance present in the country. Hence, the primary purpose of this study is to examine the role of institutional imbalance as a moderating variable between GVC participation and economic growth from 2000 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach To address the issue of endogeneity among the variables in the model, the study employs the generalized methods of moments (GMM) as an econometric analysis method. Findings The study finds that well-functioning domestic institutions facilitate the positive impact of GVC participation on economic growth. Conversely, an increased institutional imbalance harms the relationship between GVC participation and economic growth. These findings emphasize a balanced portfolio of institutional components. It advocates the holistic development of each component to reap greater benefits for GVC participation for any country. The study highlights that the weakness in one of the components must be addressed rather than substituted by increasing the strength of another component. Research limitations/implications The policies should be framed to improve the weakest component first, followed by other components of institutional quality. Simultaneous reforms involving all the dimensions of institutional quality would smoothen the path of transforming GVCs trade to the country's economic development. Additionally, the high institutional imbalance can provide a bird's eye view to policymakers to work on specific aspects of institutional quality more rigorously. Originality/value The existing literature has used a combined measure of institutional quality as a mediator variable while measuring the impact of GVC participation on economic growth. While using a combined measure, it ignores the complementarity among its components. Assuming substitutability among various components may lead to an incorrect estimation. Using the arguments proposed by Bolen and Sobel (2020), the present study considers the existence of complementarity among various components of institutional quality. It calculates the institutional imbalance used as a moderating variable while estimating the impact of GVC participation on economic growth.

Unveiling the asymmetric effects: global value chain participation and income inequality

Asymmetric effects of GVC on poverty in ASEAN and OECD

Global Value Chain Participation and Trade-Induced Energy Inequality

Globalisation and Unequalisation: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis?

Global value chains participation and trade-induced carbon inequality: A comparative analysis of developed and developing economies

Globalization of production, manufacturing employment, and income inequality in developing nations

The role of global value chains for worker tasks and wage inequality

Assessment of the heterogeneous impacts of global value chain participation on Sustainable economic growth and environmental quality

Financial constraints and global value chain participation: Firm-level evidence from India

The asymmetric effect of global value chain on environmental quality: Implications for environmental management

How does participation in Global Value Chains affect embodied carbon emissions in international trade? New insights from cross-country panel data analysis

Spreading the Gains of Globalization: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis

The Employment Effects of Global Value Chains

Global value chain participation and its impact on industrial upgrading

Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows

Bringing economic freedom back to the study of global value chains: empirical evidences from heterogeneous panel data approach

Institutional imbalance moderating the linkage between GVC participation and economic growth: empirical evidence

Global value chains and labour markets – simultaneous analysis of wages and employment

The labour share along global value chains: perspectives and evidence from sectoral interdependence

Dynamics between global value chain participation, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Evidence from a panel vector autoregression model

The Dynamics of Disparity: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Income and Wealth Inequality and Policy Interventions for Mitigation