Abstract:BACKGROUND: It is unknown how initial cervix location and cervical support resistance to traction, which we term " apical support stiffness," compare in women with different patterns of pelvic organ support. Defining a normal range of apical support stiffness is important to better understand the pathophysiology of apical support loss.OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study were to determine whether: (1) women with normal apical support on clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, but with vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele and/or rectocele), have the same intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness as women with normal pelvic support; and (2) all women with apical prolapse have abnormal intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness. A third objective was to identify clinical and biomechanical factors independently associated with clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C.STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an observational study of women with a full spectrum of pelvic organ support scheduled to undergo gynecologic surgery. All women underwent a preoperative clinic examination, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. Cervix starting location and the resistance (stiffness) of its supports to being moved steadily in the direction of a traction force that increased from 0-18 N was measured intraoperatively using a computer-controlled servoactuator device. Women were divided into 3 groups for analysis according to their pelvic support as classified using the clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification: (1) " normal/normal" was women with normal apical (C < -5 cm) and vaginal (Ba and Bp < 0 cm) support; (2) normal/prolapse had normal apical support (C < -5 cm) but prolapse of the anterior or posterior vaginal walls (Ba and/or Bp >= 0 cm); and (3) prolapse/prolapse had both apical and vaginal wall prolapse (C > -5 cm and Ba and/or Bp >= 0 cm). Demographics, intraoperative cervix locations, and apical support stiffness values were then compared. Normal range of cervix location during clinic examination and operative testing was defined by the total range of values observed in the normal/normal group. The proportion of women in each group with cervix locations within and outside the normal range was determined. Linear regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C.RESULTS: In all, 52 women were included: 14 in the normal/normal group, 11 in the normal/prolapse group, and 27 in the prolapse/prolapse group. At 1 N of traction force in the operating room, 50% of women in the normal/prolapse group had cervix locations outside the normal range while 10% had apical support stiffness outside the normal range. Of women in the prolapse/prolapse group, 81% had cervix locations outside the normal range and 8% had apical support stiffness outside the normal range. Similar results for cervix locations were observed at 18 N of traction force; however the proportion of women with apical support stiffness outside the normal range increased to 50% in the normal/prolapse group and 59% in the prolapse/prolapse group. The prolapse/prolapse group had statistically lower apical support stiffness compared to the normal/normal group with increased traction from 1-18 N (0.47 +/- 0.18 N/mm vs 0.63 +/- 0.20 N/mm, P =.006), but all other comparisons were nonsignificant. After controlling for age, parity, body mass index, and apical support stiffness, cervix location at 1 N traction force remained an independent predictor of clinic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C, but only in the prolapse/prolapse group.CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of women with cystocele and/or rectocele but normal apical support in the clinic had cervix locations outside the normal range under intraoperative traction, while 19% of women with uterine prolapse had normal apical support. Identifying women whose apical support falls outside a defined normal range may be a more accurate way to identify those who truly need a hysterectomy and/ or an apical support procedure and to spare those who do not.

Elasticity of the Cervix in Relation to Uterus Position

Relationship between endometriosis and uterine cervical elasticity assessed using ultrasound strain elastography

Quantification of cervical elasticity during pregnancy based on transvaginal ultrasound imaging and stress measurement

Evaluation of the Cervix after Cervical Conization by Transvaginal Elastography

Recommendations for strain elastography of the uterine cervix

Three-dimensional Remodeling of Collagen Fibers Within Cervical Tissues in Pregnancy

OC18.07: Vaginal elasticity is significantly decreased in postpartum vaginal prolapse: a strain elastography study

Anisotropic Material Characterization of Human Cervix Tissue Based on Indentation and Inverse Finite Element Analysis

Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis

Relation between adenomyosis and elastographic characteristics of the cervix

The role of cervical elastography in the differential diagnosis of preinvasive and invasive lesions of the cervix

Effect of Squeeze, Cough, and Strain on Dynamic Urethral Function in Nulligravid Asymptomatic Women: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study

Collagen Fiber Orientation and Dispersion in the Upper Cervix of Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women.

Intraoperative Cervix Location and Apical Support Stiffness in Women with and Without Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of the Human Uterus Measured by Spherical Indentation.

The Relationship Between the Elastic Properties and Pain Pressure Threshold in Cesarean Scar Tissue—An Observational Study

Uterus and cervix anatomical changes and cervix stiffness evolution throughout pregnancy

The Application of Shear Wave Elastography to Determine the Elasticity of the Levator Ani Muscle and Vaginal Tissue in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Predicting Cervical Insufficiency in Twin Pregnancies Using Ultrasound Cervical Measurements and Elastography

Establishing Reference Values for Vaginal Vestibule Elastography in Healthy Postmenopausal Women

Clinical experience with shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing healthy uterus in a transabdominal approach