Cancers of Unknown Primary Origin: Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Genomic Analysis at the European Institute of Oncology

Luca Boscolo Bielo,Carmen Belli,Edoardo Crimini,Matteo Repetto,Liliana Ascione,Gloria Pellizzari,Celeste Santoro,Valeria Fuorivia,Massimo Barberis,Nicola Fusco,Elena Guerini Rocco,Giuseppe Curigliano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae038
2024-03-23
The Oncologist
Abstract:Abstract Background Cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP) poses a significant challenge due to poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment options. As such, further definition of clinicopathological factors and genomic profile to better adapt treatment strategies is required. Methods Medical records were interrogated to retrospectively include CUP with available clinical and genomics data at the European Institute of Oncology. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) included targeted panels. Statistical analyses were conducted with R Software 4.2.2. Results A total of 44 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 39.46 months (interquartile range [IQR] 35.98-47.41 months), median PFS (mPFS) to first-line regimen was 3.98 months (95% CI 3.22-5.98), with a clinical benefit rate of 26% (95% CI 14%-49%), and disease control rate (DCR) limited to 48.28%. Most patients (26 of 31, 83.87%) received platinum-doublet chemotherapy, with no statistically significant difference between first-line treatment regimens. Median OS (mOS) was 18.8 months (95% CI 12.3-39.9), with a 12-month OS rate of 66% (95% CI 50%-85%). All patients received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). For 11 patients, NGS was unsuccessful due to low sample quantity and/or quality. For the remaining, TP53 (n = 16, 48%) and KRAS (n = 10, 30%) represented the most altered (alt) genes. No microsatellite instability was observed (0 of 28), while 6 of 28 (21.43%) tumors carried high TMB (≥10 mutation per megabase). Eight of 33 tumors (24.2%) displayed at least one actionable alteration with potential clinical benefit according to ESCAT. Only 2 of them received targeted therapy matched to genomic alterations, with a combined mPFS of 2.63 months (95% CI 1.84-not evaluable) as third-line regimens. Six patients received anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy, showing a meaningful mPFS of 13 months (95% CI 2.04-not evaluable). Conclusion CUP exhibits poor prognosis with limited benefits from standard treatment regimens. A significant proportion of CUPs carry actionable alterations, underscoring the importance of genomic profiling to gather additional treatment opportunities. In addition, immunotherapy might represent a valuable treatment option for a subset of CUP. Finally, accurate definition of sequencing methods and platforms is crucial to overcome NGS failures.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem this paper attempts to address is the clinical challenge of cancer of unknown primary (CUP), particularly its poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Specifically, the study aims to explore the following aspects through a retrospective analysis of CUP patient data from the European Institute of Oncology: 1. **Clinical Outcomes**: Evaluate the clinical outcomes of CUP patients, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). 2. **Genomic Characteristics**: Define the genomic characteristics of CUP through comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to identify potential targetable gene alterations. 3. **Treatment Strategies**: Investigate personalized treatment strategies based on genomic characteristics, including the clinical benefits of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. ### Background CUP is a malignancy with an unknown primary site, accounting for 2% of all solid tumor diagnoses. Due to diagnostic difficulties and limited treatment options, CUP patients have a poor long-term prognosis. Currently, standard treatment regimens typically include multi-drug combination chemotherapy, but the outcomes are suboptimal, with a 1-year survival rate of only 20%. Therefore, further definition of clinical-pathological factors and genomic characteristics is needed to better tailor treatment strategies. ### Methods The research team retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 44 CUP patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology between February 2017 and May 2023. These patients underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), including targeted sequencing panels. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.2.2. ### Results - **Clinical Outcomes**: Among the 44 patients, the median follow-up time was 39.46 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for first-line treatment was 3.98 months, with a clinical benefit rate of 26% and a disease control rate of 48.28%. The median overall survival (mOS) was 18.8 months, with a 12-month survival rate of 66%. - **Genomic Characteristics**: All patients underwent CGP, but 11 patients could not successfully undergo NGS due to low sample quantity and/or quality. Among the remaining patients, TP53 and KRAS were the most commonly mutated genes. 24.2% of patients harbored at least one targetable gene alteration. - **Treatment Strategies**: Out of 8 patients, 2 received targeted therapy matched to their gene alterations, with a median PFS of 2.63 months. Six patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment, showing a significant median PFS of 13 months. ### Conclusion CUP patients have a poor prognosis, and the efficacy of standard treatment regimens is limited. Genomic analysis reveals that a considerable proportion of CUP patients harbor targetable gene alterations, highlighting the importance of genomic profiling in uncovering potential therapeutic opportunities. Additionally, immunotherapy may offer valuable treatment options for some CUP patients. Finally, accurate sequencing methods and platform selection are crucial to overcoming NGS failures. ### Practical Significance This study provides real-world evidence of clinical outcomes in CUP patients, emphasizing the limitations of standard treatment regimens. Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify gene alterations with potential clinical value, thereby providing a basis for personalized and targeted treatment strategies. Immunotherapy has shown good efficacy in some CUP patients, offering new therapeutic opportunities to further improve patient prognosis.