Abstract:Post-earthquake fire (PEF) is a threatening hazard triggered immediately after an earthquake, resulting in extensive destruction and casualties. It is important to evaluate structural performance in this typical cascading hazard to develop mitigation strategies and improve multi-hazard resilience. However, existing research mainly focuses on the structural response in PEF scenarios, while there is still a lack of knowledge on other critical parts of performance evaluation. In contrast, there has been a well-established methodology for performance-based assessment in earthquake engineering (PBEE), which can be regarded as the basis for extension to PEF sce-narios. Based on that, a comprehensive framework has been proposed in this study for performance-based assessment in post-earthquake fire engineering (PB-PEF-E). To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology, an illustrative example of a realistic multi-storey steel frame is presented with specific details. The overall procedure considering the hazard, structure, damage, and loss domains is utilised for step-by-step PEF performance evaluation. Firstly, a dual-cause PEF ignition model is used to capture the probabilistic causation among the earthquake-fire sequence, considering ignition related to utility system damage and ignitable contents overturning. Then, structural demands with respect to both earthquake and fire intensities are obtained by a series of nonlinear analyses via numerical modelling, and uncertainties that significantly influence the responses are included. Finally, the structural capacity in different performance levels is estimated with PEF fragility development, and the consequences are measured using quantitative indicators for decision-making. The pro-posed methodology provides important benefits in evaluating the performance of alternative solutions thus facilitating robust decision-making in PEF scenarios, and it can be further extended to performance-based assessment in other multi-hazard scenarios with cascading effects.

Factor Prioritization in FEMA P-58 Loss Estimation

Consequences of consequence models: The impact of economies of scale on seismic loss estimates

Impact of the Uncertainty in the Parameters of the Earthquake Occurrence Model on Loss Estimates of Urban Building Portfolios

Probabilistic Prediction of Postdisaster Functionality Loss of Community Building Portfolios Considering Utility Disruptions

Investigating the sensitivity of losses to time-dependent components of seismic risk modeling

Accounting for ground-motion uncertainty in empirical seismic fragility modeling

A Resilience-based Method for Prioritizing Post-event Building Inspections

Seismic probabilistic assessment of steel and reinforced concrete structures including earthquake-induced pounding

Application of the FEMA-P58 Methodology for Regional Earthquake Loss Prediction

Impact of Probabilistic Modeling Alternatives on the Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Dual Wall–Frame Buildings towards Resilient Designs

Resilience Loss Factor for Evaluation and Design Considering the Effects of Aftershocks

Vision‐based probabilistic post‐earthquake loss estimation for reinforced concrete shear walls

Evaluating the impact of uncertainty in ground motion forecasts for post-earthquake impact modeling applications

A Framework for Performance-Based Assessment in Post-Earthquake Fire: Methodology and Case Study

Seismic Intensity Measure Selection Incorporating Interaction Effects for Damage Assessment Across Different Structural Sensitive Regions

Convex Model For Earthquake Damage And Loss Estimation Of Individual Buildings

Scenario-Based Comprehensive Assessment for Community Resilience Adapted to Fire Following an Earthquake, Implementing the Analytic Network Process and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enriched Evaluation II Techniques

Seismic Hazard Expression in Risk Assessment

Impact of seismotectonic source zoning and seismic parameter: Sensitivity study on probabilistic seismic hazard assessment

Raising the bar in seismic design: cost–benefit analysis of alternative design methodologies and earthquake-resistant technologies

Elevated collapse risk based on decaying aftershock hazard and damaged building fragilities