Abstract:The present study had three main objectives. First, we aimed to evaluate whether short-duration affective states induced by negative and positive words can lead to increased error-monitoring activity relative to a neutral task condition. Second, we intended to determine whether such an enhancement is limited to words of specific valence or is a general response to arousing material. Third, we wanted to assess whether post-error brain activity is associated with incidental memory for negative and/or positive words. Participants performed an emotional stop-signal task that required response inhibition to negative, positive or neutral nouns while EEG was recorded. Immediately after the completion of the task, they were instructed to recall as many of the presented words as they could in an unexpected free recall test. We observed significantly greater brain activity in the error-positivity (Pe) time window in both negative and positive trials. The error-related negativity amplitudes were comparable in both the neutral and emotional arousing trials, regardless of their valence. Regarding behavior, increased processing of emotional words was reflected in better incidental recall. Importantly, the memory performance for negative words was positively correlated with the Pe amplitude, particularly in the negative condition. The source localization analysis revealed that the subsequent memory recall for negative words was associated with widespread bilateral brain activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and in the medial frontal gyrus, which was registered in the Pe time window during negative trials. The present study has several important conclusions. First, it indicates that the emotional enhancement of error monitoring, as reflected by the Pe amplitude, may be induced by stimuli with symbolic, ontogenetically learned emotional significance. Second, it indicates that the emotion-related enhancement of the Pe occurs across both negative and positive conditions, thus it is preferentially driven by the arousal content of an affective stimuli. Third, our findings suggest that enhanced error monitoring and facilitated recall of negative words may both reflect responsivity to negative events. More speculatively, they can also indicate that post-error activity of the medial prefrontal cortex may selectively support encoding for negative stimuli and contribute to their privileged access to memory.

Why is there an error negativity on correct trials? A reappraisal

Larger error negativity peak amplitudes for accuracy versus speed instructions may reflect more neuro-cognitive alignment, not more intense error processing

The neural signature of an erroneous thought

Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect

Delayed monitoring of accuracy errors compared to commission errors in ACC

Post-error Brain Activity Correlates With Incidental Memory for Negative Words

Non-reward Neural Mechanisms in the Orbitofrontal Cortex

Mismatch Negativity: time for deconstruction

To bet or not to bet? The error negativity or error-related negativity associated with risk-taking choices.

Cortical origin of theta error signals

Neural indicators of error processing in generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder.

Does the FRN in brain potentials reflect motivational/affective consequence of outcome evaluation?

Study of Neural Generators of Error-Related Negativity Component of Event-Related Potentials

Motor oscillations reveal new correlates of error processing in the human brain

A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation

Neural Activities Underlying the Feedback Express Salience Prediction Errors for Appetitive and Aversive Stimuli

Application of Error-Related Negativity (ERN) in Psychopathological Research

The Neutral Generator and Functional Significance of Error Positivity

Dissociable neural signals for reward and emotion prediction errors

Narcissism and the perception of failure - evidence from the error-related negativity and the error positivity

Negative symptoms and the failure to represent the expected reward value of actions: behavioral and computational modeling evidence