Abstract:Background: It has been hypothesized that prematurity and adjunctive neonatal care is 'a priori' a risk for disturbances of palatal and orofacial development which increases the need for later orthodontic or orthognathic treatment. As results on late consequences of prematurity are consistently contradictory, the necessity exists for a fundamental analysis of existing methodologies, confounding factors, and outcomes of studies on palatal development in preterm and low birthweight infants. Method: A search of the literature was conducted based on Cochrane search strategies including sources in English, German, and French. Original data were recalculated from studies which primarily dealt with both preterm and term infants. The extracted data, especially those from non-English paper sources, were provided unfiltered in tables for comparison (Parts 1 and 2). Results: Morphology assessment of the infant palate is subject to non-standardized visual and metrical measurements. Most methodologies are inadequate for measuring a three-dimensional shape. Several confounding factors were identified as causes contributing to disturbances of palatal and orofacial development. Conclusion: Taking into account the abovementioned shortcomings, the following conclusions may be drawn for practitioners and prospective investigators of clinical studies. 1) The lack of uniformity in the anatomical nomenclature of the infant's palate underlines the need for a uniform definition. 2) Metrically, non-intubated preterm infants do not exhibit different palatal width or height compared to matched term infants up to the corrected age of three months. Beyond that age, no data on the subject are currently available. 3) Oral intubation does not invariably alter palatal morphology of preterm and low birthweight infants. 4) The findings on palatal grooving, height, and asymmetry as a consequence of orotracheal intubation up to the age of 11 years are inconsistent. 5) Metrically, the palates of orally intubated infants remain narrower posteriorly, beginning at the second deciduous molar, until the age of 11 years. Beyond that age, no data on the subject are currently available. 6) There is a definite need for further, especially metrical, longitudinal and controlled trials on palatal morphology of preterm and low birthweight infants with reliable measuring techniques. 7) None of the raised confounding factors for developmental disturbances may be excluded until evident results are presented. Thus, early orthodontic and logopedic control of formerly premature infants is recommended up to the late mixed dentition stage.

Overjet in Infants: A Cross-Sectional Study

Maximal Mouth Opening in Infants: A Single-Group Prospective Cohort Study

Craniofacial and Velopharyngeal Dimensions in Infants 0-12 Months: Between- and Within-Group Differences Based on Age and Sex

Study on the correlation between the structure of TMJ and vertical craniofaciai pattern, occlusion in Class Ⅱ1 Children

Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants - What do we know? Part 1: The palate of the term newborn

Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants -- What do we know? Part 3: discussion and conclusion

[Longitudinal Study of the Growth of Craniofacial Widths in 13-18 Years Adolescents with Normal Occlusion].

Relationship between Nutrition and Development of the Jaws in Children: A Pilot Study

Developmental Risk for Infants with Cleft Lip with or Without Cleft Palate Based on Caregiver-Proxy Reports

Occlusal Outcomes in Non-Robin Sequence Patients with Isolated Cleft Palate

A longitudinal study of the probability of developing malocclusion in children using a Bayesian analysis

Surgical Outcome and Treatment Trends in 1289 Infants with Micrognathia: A Multicenter Cohort

Correlation between Cleft Width and Adjacent Teeth Inclination in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using CBCT: A Retrospective Study

'Oro‐facial function and quality of life in children and adolescents with large horizontal maxillary overjet—A case–control study'

Geographic and Socioeconomic Considerations

Mouth Breathing Habit and Their Effects on Dentofacial Growth in Children in the Age Range of 6-14 Years: A Cephalometric Study

Breathing mode influence on craniofacial development and head posture

Maximum mouth opening in patients with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies compared with non‐affected controls: A cross‐sectional study

The Craniofacial Morphology in Adult Patients with Unoperated Isolated Cleft Palate

12-Year Trends of Orofacial Clefts in the United States: Highlighting Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prevalence of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate

Incisor position and alveolar bone thickness.