Abstract:Introduction: After an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, service members often undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to restore knee stability, which is critical for performing physically demanding and unconventional military-specific tasks. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, a large portion of service members will not fully return to duty (RTD) post-ACLR and will receive a permanent profile restriction (PP) or undergo a medical evaluation board (MEB). The timing of ACLR is a modifiable factor that can potentially impact RTD and remains underexplored in this population. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the timing of ACLR and its impact on RTD and meniscal procedures performed at index ACLR. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted among active duty military personnel who underwent primary ACLR at Madigan Army Medical Center between October 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was the number of RTD, PP, or MEB outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the incidence and type of meniscal procedure performed at index ACLR. Kruskal-Wallis analyses were employed to assess the relationships between time to ACLR and RTD, as well as the incidence and type of meniscal procedure performed. After separating time to ACLR into four distinct time-based groups (0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months), a chi-squared test with post hoc analysis via Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction was conducted to identify a time interval from injury to ACLR that impacted RTD. Results: Initial analysis to assess the relationship between time to ACLR and outcome (RTD, PP, or MEB) were significant (P = .02). Subsequent analyses performed between 4 distinct time-based groups (0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months) were also significant (P = .03). Pairwise comparisons revealed an 80% rate of RTD in the 0-3 month group compared to a 53% RTD rate in 3-6 month group (P = .006). However, comparisons between the 3-6 month and 6-12 month group (P = .68) and between the 6-12 month and greater than 12 month groups were not significant (P = .80).Additionally, time to ACLR significantly differed between service members who did not undergo any concurrent meniscal procedure to those who had a meniscal debridement (P = .002), and to those who underwent meniscal repair (P = .02). There was no significant difference in time to ACLR between those who underwent debridement versus repair (P = .22). Patients without any meniscal procedure had an average surgery time of 175 days, compared to 240 days for those undergoing meniscal repair and 295 days for those with meniscal debridement. Conclusion: The findings from this novel study suggest that ACLR within 3 months after injury can improve the likelihood of RTD without limitations. The timing of ACLR can also impact the incidence and type of meniscal procedures, as patients who did not undergo any concomitant meniscal procedures underwent ACLR within 6 months after injury. This study offers valuable insight into the importance of earlier ACLR among service members to improve RTD rates and decrease additional concomitant meniscal procedures.

Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Performed Within 10 Days of Injury Does Not Increase Risk of Postoperative Arthrofibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Impact of Surgical Timing on Functional Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Optimal Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

The optimal window for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with respect to quadriceps atrophies lies within 21 to 100 days

Safety and Early Return to Sports for Early ACL Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Retrospective Study

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of meniscus injury: Exploring the safest delay interval

Risk factors for reoperation for arthrofibrosis following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Fifteen-Year Radiographic Follow-up Comparison of Early Versus Delayed ACL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Review of a Previous Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture

Rate and Timing of Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Relative to Index Surgery

Risk Factors for Short-term Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States

Return to Work After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Early Surgical Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

After 40 days intra‐articular injury, risk profile increases linearly with time to surgery in adolescent patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Risk Factors for the Development of Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents

Short-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort

The Impact of Time to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Return to Duty Among Active Duty Military Personnel

Nonoperative Treatment as an Option for Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A slight degree of osteoarthritis appears to be present after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with contralateral healthy knees at a minimum of 20 years: A systematic review of the literature

Editorial Commentary: Limited Preoperative Range of Motion Is Associated With Range of Motion Deficits After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: "If the Knee Is Not Straight, Wait"